On Monday 16 March 2015 18:18:22 Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 06:00 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> >>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an ema
On 03/16/2015 06:00 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
>> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep
>>> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no
> On 16 Mar 2015, at 13:01, Mihai Donțu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep
>> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or
>> acurate. Feel free t
> On 16 Mar 2015, at 10:43, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>
>> Wei, perhaps one or more of these could be applied:
>> * raise the bar for inclusion in the list for external projects to
>>be only the very largest most important ite
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:56 + wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep
> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or
> acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my
> misu
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:41AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (culling the cc list a lot)
>
> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:54 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote:
> > > == Linux ==
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have
> > our core pieces
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:05:15PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/03/15 18:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> * vsyscall in Linux (fair)
> >> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > Not done. Still in 'git stash'.
> >
> >> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair)
> >>RFC posted
> >> - K
On 13/03/15 18:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> * vsyscall in Linux (fair)
>> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Not done. Still in 'git stash'.
>
>> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair)
>>RFC posted
>> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Pff.. I've the patches but would need to post them and
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:54:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote:
> > == Linux ==
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have
> our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the
> top?
>
> > * Convert tasklet to per-cpu taskle
> * vsyscall in Linux (fair)
> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Not done. Still in 'git stash'.
> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair)
>RFC posted
> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Pff.. I've the patches but would need to post them and
redo them. Too busy right now.
Might as well move them t
> == Hypervisor ==
>
> * Alternate p2m: support multiple copies of host p2m (ok)
> - Ed White
>
I'm hoping to see some progress on getting this restarted
in the next 2 or 3 weeks, with additional Intel resources.
Ed
___
Xen-devel mailing list
X
(culling the cc list a lot)
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 11:54 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote:
> > == Linux ==
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have
> our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the
> top?
When I originally st
> * Intel memory bandwidth monitoring for VMs (fair)
>v9 posted
> - Chao Peng
>
Wei, this one is already merged.
Thanks,
Chao
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Thu, Mar 12, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:21:56AM +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> > * Rearrange and cleanup installation destination directories (/var ->
> > var/lib/xen) (fair)
> > - Daniel Kiper
> If Olaf did all work then we can remove this one.
What does this m
On Thu, Mar 12, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> IIRC, 4.3 release (and probably earlier ones) was a mess. Olaf did the
> work for 4.5. However, as he pointed out in another email last one is
> incorrect. Olaf, are you going to fix it for 4.6? I suppose it is
> quite simple.
There are still many hardcoded
>>> On 3/12/2015 at 06:21 PM, in message
, wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep
> track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and /
> or
> acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or corre
2015-03-12 11:39 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
>
> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> >
> > > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair)
> > >RFC patch posted (v2)
> > > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanV
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:21:56AM +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
[...]
> == GRUB2 ==
>
> * GRUB2 multiboot2 (fair)
> - Daniel Kiper
RFC patches were posted (see:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03982.html).
Weeding out bugs found during testing. I am going to pos
>-Original Message-
>From: wei.l...@citrix.com [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com]
>
>* extending mem_access support to PV domain (fair)
> RFC v2
> - Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)
We did some internal reprioritizing and decided to focus on HVM and PVH
domains. This can be placed in de
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:07:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
[...]
> > * Rearrange and cleanup installation destination directories (/var ->
> > var/lib/xen) (fair)
> > - Daniel Kiper
>
> What is this? I've never heard about it
All,
I expect to have a patch out soon for the RTDS scheduler improvement.
Regards,
Dagaen Golomb
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > dist/install/var/xen/dump
> > which all seems proper and correct to me.
>
> Except the last
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>
> > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair)
> >RFC patch posted (v2)
> > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen
>
> This was superceded by the RTDS stuff, wasn't
On Thu, Mar 12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> dist/install/var/xen/dump
> which all seems proper and correct to me.
Except the last one, which should be /var/lib/xen/dump or whatever
dumpdir the OS/FHS provides.
Olaf
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-dev
>On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 15:07 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>>
> > * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair)
>> >RFC patch posted (v2)
>> > - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen
>>
>> This was superceded by the RTDS stuff,
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:21 +, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> * Repurpose SEDF Scheduler for Real-time (fair)
>RFC patch posted (v2)
> - Joshua Whitehead, Robert VanVossen
This was superceded by the RTDS stuff, wasn't it?
> === Hypervisor ARM ===
>
> * Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP
On 3/12/2015 6:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
* amd_ucode cleanups, verify patch size(enhancement) (mostly in master
except one patch)
Which one?
This is in reference to the patches to microcode_amd and it's all 'done'
in 4.5 itself.
I think when we were tracking this, commit 8b24b07e was not in
>
> * Clean-up of mem-event subsystem (good)
>v5 posted
> - Tamas K Lengyel
>
v7 will be posted today, status is good.
> === Hypervisor ARM ===
>
I've posted v13 of the mem_access for ARM series that should be added to
this tracker. Status should be good.
Thanks,
Tamas
>>> On 12.03.15 at 11:21, wrote:
> == Linux ==
Wouldn't it make sense to move external projects down, and have
our core pieces (hypervisor, tool stack, maybe qemu) be near the
top?
> * Convert tasklet to per-cpu tasklets (fair)
>RFC posted
> - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Is this still a valid
On 03/12/2015 11:34 AM, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> Il 12/03/2015 11:54, George Dunlap ha scritto:
>> On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>>
>>> * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair)
>>>- Justin T. Weaver
>> The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be
Il 12/03/2015 11:54, George Dunlap ha scritto:
On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
* Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair)
- Justin T. Weaver
The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be very surprised if
these didn't make it in by July. I'd cha
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:54 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
>
> > * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair)
> > - Justin T. Weaver
>
> The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be very surprised if
> these didn't make
On 03/12/2015 10:21 AM, wei.l...@citrix.com wrote:
> * Credit2: introduce per-vcpu hard and soft affinity (fair)
> - Justin T. Weaver
The most recent patches looked pretty good -- I'd be very surprised if
these didn't make it in by July. I'd change this to "good".
> * Default to credit2 (n
Hi all
We are now two months into 4.6 development window. This is an email to keep
track of all the patch series I gathered. It is by no means complete and / or
acurate. Feel free to reply this email with new projects or correct my
misunderstanding.
= Timeline =
We are planning on a 9-month rele
33 matches
Mail list logo
