Or should I modify the linux kernel to add support for handling #VE
exception?
2016-09-02 16:35 GMT+08:00 Big Strong :
> Sorry for that. Could you give any suggestions on how to register the IRQ
> handler for #VE?
>
> 2016-09-02 15:52 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>
>> >>> On 02.09.16 at 04:59, wrote:
Sorry for that. Could you give any suggestions on how to register the IRQ
handler for #VE?
2016-09-02 15:52 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
> >>> On 02.09.16 at 04:59, wrote:
> > I'm recently trying to utilize the virtualization exception (#VE)
> feature.
> > As the document says, #VE is handled by gues
>>> On 02.09.16 at 04:59, wrote:
> I'm recently trying to utilize the virtualization exception (#VE) feature.
> As the document says, #VE is handled by guest interrupt handler. The IRQ
> number of #VE is 20. However, when I tried to register an IRQ handler for
> #VE, it returns errno -22, which me
Hello.
I'm recently trying to utilize the virtualization exception (#VE) feature.
As the document says, #VE is handled by guest interrupt handler. The IRQ
number of #VE is 20. However, when I tried to register an IRQ handler for
#VE, it returns errno -22, which means invalid arguments.
request_ir
