Re: [Xen-devel] kexec's v1 compatibility code

2015-05-11 Thread Jan Beulich
On 08.05.15 at 17:53, dvra...@cantab.net wrote: On 08/05/15 14:34, Jan Beulich wrote: now that we're putting Xen 4.4.x underneath an older distro (SLE11) we've got to see that kexec doesn't work there. Initial investigation of our kexec person revealed that the destinations attempted to be

Re: [Xen-devel] kexec's v1 compatibility code

2015-05-11 Thread David Vrabel
On 11/05/15 10:25, Jan Beulich wrote: On 08.05.15 at 17:53, dvra...@cantab.net wrote: On 08/05/15 14:34, Jan Beulich wrote: now that we're putting Xen 4.4.x underneath an older distro (SLE11) we've got to see that kexec doesn't work there. Initial investigation of our kexec person revealed

[Xen-devel] kexec's v1 compatibility code

2015-05-08 Thread Jan Beulich
David, now that we're putting Xen 4.4.x underneath an older distro (SLE11) we've got to see that kexec doesn't work there. Initial investigation of our kexec person revealed that the destinations attempted to be written to by kexec_reloc()'s code following the is_source and is_zero labels have no

Re: [Xen-devel] kexec's v1 compatibility code

2015-05-08 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 08/05/15 14:34, Jan Beulich wrote: David, now that we're putting Xen 4.4.x underneath an older distro (SLE11) we've got to see that kexec doesn't work there. Initial investigation of our kexec person revealed that the destinations attempted to be written to by kexec_reloc()'s code

Re: [Xen-devel] kexec's v1 compatibility code

2015-05-08 Thread David Vrabel
On 08/05/15 14:34, Jan Beulich wrote: David, now that we're putting Xen 4.4.x underneath an older distro (SLE11) we've got to see that kexec doesn't work there. Initial investigation of our kexec person revealed that the destinations attempted to be written to by kexec_reloc()'s code