i.l...@citrix.com>; Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; Konrad
> > Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org;
> > stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booti
<konrad.w...@oracle.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org;
> stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:14:46PM +0200, Samuel Thibaul
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:14:46PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > > > > +if (prod - out_cons >= XENFB_OUT_RING_LEN) {
> > > > > > +return;
> > > > > > +}
> >
> > This test seems overzealous to me:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:14:46PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > > > +if (prod - out_cons >= XENFB_OUT_RING_LEN) {
> > > > > +return;
> > > > > +}
>
> This test seems overzealous to me: AIUI, the producer can produce
> XENFB_OUT_RING_LEN events, and thus prod -
Hello,
> > > > +if (prod - out_cons >= XENFB_OUT_RING_LEN) {
> > > > +return;
> > > > +}
This test seems overzealous to me: AIUI, the producer can produce
XENFB_OUT_RING_LEN events, and thus prod - out_cons is exactly
XENFB_OUT_RING_LEN, i.e. there is no room left at all.
The
.@intel.com>
> > Cc: samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wei Liu
> > <wei.l...@citrix.com>; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 20
u
> <wei.l...@citrix.com>; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 02:05:28AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.
Xudong <xudong@intel.com>; wei.l...@citrix.com;
> > samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; xen-
> > de...@lists.xen.org
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 09:21:14AM -040
efano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 09:21:14AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 02:03:35AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
>
gt; Rzeszutek Wilk
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:58 AM
> > > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong@intel.com>
> > > Cc: stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 02:03:35AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun
<xudong@intel.com>
> > Cc: stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:16:40AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > For Xen ups
gt; Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] pv-grub guest booting fail with recent qemu-xen
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:16:40AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> > Hi,
> > For Xen upstream master branch with commit 1949868d, After updating qemu-
> xen version from fcf6ac57 to 2ce1d30e, booting
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:16:40AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote:
> Hi,
> For Xen upstream master branch with commit 1949868d, After updating qemu-xen
> version from fcf6ac57 to 2ce1d30e, booting a pv-grub guest will fail.
> Attach the guest config file and Xen log.
Is this still an issue? I saw an
Hi,
For Xen upstream master branch with commit 1949868d, After updating qemu-xen
version from fcf6ac57 to 2ce1d30e, booting a pv-grub guest will fail.
Attach the guest config file and Xen log.
Best Regards,
Xudong
(XEN) Bad console= option '115200'
(XEN) Bad console= option '8n1'
Xen
15 matches
Mail list logo
