On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:51:48AM +0800, Zhang Chen wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/2017 12:54 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > And CC Zhangchen
>
> Thanks, I will apply this patch set before test my patch.
>
This is not yet the final form. Please need to wait until this work gets
applied.
Wei.
___
On 02/09/2017 12:54 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
And CC Zhangchen
Thanks, I will apply this patch set before test my patch.
Zhang Chen
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:35:27PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
Cc Yi Sun as well.
Haozhong and Yi: This is just a heads-up -- Juergen from SuSE took the
time to split
On 02/08/17 14:35 +, Wei Liu wrote:
Cc Yi Sun as well.
Haozhong and Yi: This is just a heads-up -- Juergen from SuSE took the
time to split libxl.c so things are better organised. It's likely this
series will go in before yours, so you will then need to rebase your
series. I don't expect the
And CC Zhangchen
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:35:27PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Cc Yi Sun as well.
>
> Haozhong and Yi: This is just a heads-up -- Juergen from SuSE took the
> time to split libxl.c so things are better organised. It's likely this
> series will go in before yours, so you will then nee
On 08/02/17 17:12, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c"):
>> Okay, more precise wording:
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Changes are:
>> - moving functions into new or existing sources
>> - modification of Copyright comment
>
>> - made two functions non-static:
Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c"):
> Okay, more precise wording:
Thanks.
> Changes are:
> - moving functions into new or existing sources
> - modification of Copyright comment
> - made two functions non-static: libxl__get_memory_target(),
> xcinfo2xlinfo()
> - m
On 08/02/17 15:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c"):
>> Code movement only. No functional change intended.
>
> This statement is not true because
>
>> Juergen Gross (9):
>> libxl: adjust copyright comment of libxl.c
>
> ... that patch is not ju
Cc Yi Sun as well.
Haozhong and Yi: This is just a heads-up -- Juergen from SuSE took the
time to split libxl.c so things are better organised. It's likely this
series will go in before yours, so you will then need to rebase your
series. I don't expect there to be much breakage because it is all
m
Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH 0/9] libxl: spolit up libxl.c"):
> Code movement only. No functional change intended.
This statement is not true because
> Juergen Gross (9):
> libxl: adjust copyright comment of libxl.c
... that patch is not just code motion.
Can you please double-check, and exp
