On 03/06/2017 07:31 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
There seems to be some weird bug in clang 4.0 that prevents xsm_pmu_op from
working as expected, and vpmu.o ends up with a reference to
__xsm_action_mismatch_detected which makes the build fail:
[...]
ld-melf_x86_64_fbsd -T xen.lds -N prelink.o
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 05:52:14AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.03.17 at 13:31, wrote:
> > There seems to be some weird bug in clang 4.0 that prevents xsm_pmu_op from
> > working as expected, and vpmu.o ends up with a reference to
> > __xsm_action_mismatch_detected which makes the build f
On 03/06/2017 09:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.03.17 at 15:42, wrote:
>> On 03/06/2017 07:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.03.17 at 13:31, wrote:
There seems to be some weird bug in clang 4.0 that prevents xsm_pmu_op from
working as expected, and vpmu.o ends up with a refer
>>> On 06.03.17 at 15:42, wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 07:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.03.17 at 13:31, wrote:
>>> There seems to be some weird bug in clang 4.0 that prevents xsm_pmu_op from
>>> working as expected, and vpmu.o ends up with a reference to
>>> __xsm_action_mismatch_detected which
On 03/06/2017 07:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.03.17 at 13:31, wrote:
>> There seems to be some weird bug in clang 4.0 that prevents xsm_pmu_op from
>> working as expected, and vpmu.o ends up with a reference to
>> __xsm_action_mismatch_detected which makes the build fail:
>>
>> [...]
>> ld
>>> On 06.03.17 at 13:31, wrote:
> There seems to be some weird bug in clang 4.0 that prevents xsm_pmu_op from
> working as expected, and vpmu.o ends up with a reference to
> __xsm_action_mismatch_detected which makes the build fail:
>
> [...]
> ld-melf_x86_64_fbsd -T xen.lds -N prelink.o \
