.@lists.xen.org
> [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Joao Martins
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 6:27 PM
> To: Wei Liu
> Cc: ian.campb...@citrix.com; net...@vger.kernel.org; david.vra...@citrix.com;
> xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org;boris.ostrov...@oracle.com
> Subject: Re:
en-de...@lists.xenproject.org; boris.ostrov...@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/13] Persistent grant maps for xen net
drivers
On 19 May 2015, at 17:39, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
>
>> There have been recently[3]
On 19 May 2015, at 17:39, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
>
>> There have been recently[3] some discussions and issues raised on
>> persistent grants for the block layer, though the numbers above
>> show some significant improvements specially on m
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Joao Martins wrote:
> There have been recently[3] some discussions and issues raised on
> persistent grants for the block layer, though the numbers above
> show some significant improvements specially on more network intensive
> workloads and provide a mar
On 13 May 2015, at 12:50, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 12/05/15 18:18, Joao Martins wrote:
>>
>> Packet I/O Tests:
>>
>> Measured on a Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2, Xen 4.5, no HT. Used pktgen "burst 1"
>> and "clone_skbs 10" (to avoid alloc skb overheads) with various pkt
>> sizes. All tests are Dom
On 12/05/15 18:18, Joao Martins wrote:
>
> Packet I/O Tests:
>
> Measured on a Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2, Xen 4.5, no HT. Used pktgen "burst 1"
> and "clone_skbs 10" (to avoid alloc skb overheads) with various pkt
> sizes. All tests are DomU <-> Dom0, unless specified otherwise.
Are all these me
