On 12/23/2016 05:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would
> also
> be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
> use it.
>
> Xen doesn't have an AML parser, so I'm not sure how is it sup
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would
> also
> be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
> use it.
>
> Xen doesn't have an AML parser, so I'm not sure how is it suppos
On 3 January 2017 at 17:50, Al Stone wrote:
> On 12/23/2016 05:51 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been looking into the STAO specification[0], because I think it would
>> also
>> be useful for x86 PVHv2 Dom0, but I'm not really sure how is Xen supposed to
>> use it.
>>
>> Xen does
