[Xen-devel] [xen-4.10-testing test] 118529: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118529 xen-4.10-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118529/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 10 windows-install fail in 118490 pass in 118529 test-amd64-i386-xl-qe

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 118546: regressions - FAIL

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118546 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118546/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539 Tests which are failing

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 118534: regressions - FAIL

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118534 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118534/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 118441 Tests which

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: hypercall: fix out-of-bounds memcpy

2018-02-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 02/02/2018 10:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> The legacy hypercall handlers were originally added with >> a comment explaining that "copying the argument structures in >> HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op() and HYPERVISOR_physdev_op() into the

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 118549: regressions - FAIL

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118549 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118549/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539 Tests which did not suc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/svm: update VGIF support

2018-02-03 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/31/2018 03:35 PM, Brian Woods wrote: There are places where the GIF value is checked. A guest with VGIF enabled can change the GIF value without the host being involved, therefore it needs to check the GIF value in the VMCB rather the one in the nestedsvm struct. Signed-off-by: Brian Wo

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/svm: add EFER SVME support for VGIF/VLOAD

2018-02-03 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/31/2018 03:35 PM, Brian Woods wrote: Only enable virtual VMLOAD/SAVE and VGIF if the guest EFER.SVME is set. Reported-by: Andrew Cooper Signed-off-by: Brian Woods Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/svm: correct EFER.SVME intercept checks

2018-02-03 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/31/2018 03:35 PM, Brian Woods wrote: Corrects some EFER.SVME checks in intercepts. See AMD APM vol2 section 15.4 for more details. VMMCALL isn't checked due to guests needing it to boot. Don't you need SVME be on for VMMCALL? -boris ___

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: hypercall: fix out-of-bounds memcpy

2018-02-03 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/03/2018 10:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/02/2018 10:32 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: The legacy hypercall handlers were originally added with a comment explaining that "copying the argument structures in HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/svm: correct EFER.SVME intercept checks

2018-02-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/02/18 17:03, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 01/31/2018 03:35 PM, Brian Woods wrote: >> Corrects some EFER.SVME checks in intercepts.  See AMD APM vol2 section >> 15.4 for more details.  VMMCALL isn't checked due to guests needing it >> to boot. >> > > Don't you need SVME be on for VMMCALL?

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/svm: correct EFER.SVME intercept checks

2018-02-03 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/03/2018 12:10 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 03/02/18 17:03, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 01/31/2018 03:35 PM, Brian Woods wrote: Corrects some EFER.SVME checks in intercepts.  See AMD APM vol2 section 15.4 for more details.  VMMCALL isn't checked due to guests needing it to boot. Don't

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 118538: regressions - FAIL

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118538 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118538/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 12 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 118324 test-amd64-amd64-xl

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 118535: regressions - FAIL

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118535 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118535/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 118464 test-amd64-amd64-xl-

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 118545: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118545 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118545/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 118505 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saveresto

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 118553: regressions - FAIL

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118553 seabios real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118553/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539 Tests which did not suc

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 118548: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118548 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118548/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 118515 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 sav

[Xen-devel] [GSOC] Xen on ARM: create multiple guests from device tree

2018-02-03 Thread Denis Obrezkov
Hello all, I would like to participate in GSoC 2018 with the project Xen on ARM related project. I have some previous experience with GSoC: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2017/projects/4780624749527040/ Could you give me more details on the project? I have RPi3 and BBB boards, or sh

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC] Xen on ARM: create multiple guests from device tree

2018-02-03 Thread Denis Obrezkov
2018-02-04 9:53 GMT+03:00 Denis Obrezkov : > Hello all, > > I would like to participate in GSoC 2018 with the project Xen on ARM > related project. I have some previous experience with GSoC: > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2017/projects/4780624749527040/ > > Could you give me more det

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 118551: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2018-02-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 118551 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/118551/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 118423 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 save