[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 121349: regressions - FAIL

flight 121349 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121349/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 121247

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On 3/30/18 11:37 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> On 3/30/18 3:50 AM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: On 3/29/18 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On

Re: [Xen-devel] seabios regression in staging

On 3/29/18 3:00 PM, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> If you'd be willing to create a SLE11 Docker container, we can add that >> to the tree and start doing builds against it. > > I do not know how to do that. Any pointers? > > Olaf > Find the base image for

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 121343: regressions - FAIL

flight 121343 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121343/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 14 xen-boot/l1 fail REGR. vs. 120095

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 121345: regressions - FAIL

flight 121345 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121345/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 17 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail REGR. vs. 119227 Tests

Re: [Xen-devel] SVM NPT mem_access and npfec.insn_fetch

On 03/31/2018 12:52 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Well... If you don't set the real permissions bits, how is hardware > going to know that you don't want this page to be executed, and raise a > nested page fault in the first place? Right, it's obvious in retrospect. We were fooled by the way it

Re: [Xen-devel] SVM NPT mem_access and npfec.insn_fetch

On 30/03/2018 22:47, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 03/31/2018 12:14 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 30/03/2018 22:06, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> We've been trying to enable mem_access events for SVM, and we do receive >>> some events with xen-access if we set the pages read-only.

Re: [Xen-devel] SVM NPT mem_access and npfec.insn_fetch

On 03/31/2018 12:14 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/03/2018 22:06, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We've been trying to enable mem_access events for SVM, and we do receive >> some events with xen-access if we set the pages read-only. However, the >> exec xen-access tests fails, because it

Re: [Xen-devel] SVM NPT mem_access and npfec.insn_fetch

On 30/03/2018 22:06, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > Hello, > > We've been trying to enable mem_access events for SVM, and we do receive > some events with xen-access if we set the pages read-only. However, the > exec xen-access tests fails, because it appears that npfec.insn_fetch is > always 0 here (or

[Xen-devel] SVM NPT mem_access and npfec.insn_fetch

Hello, We've been trying to enable mem_access events for SVM, and we do receive some events with xen-access if we set the pages read-only. However, the exec xen-access tests fails, because it appears that npfec.insn_fetch is always 0 here (or at least we haven't seen it to be 1 in a lot of

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 121342: regressions - FAIL

flight 121342 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121342/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 121272

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xl/libxl: add pvcalls support

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:25:34AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Add pvcalls support to libxl and xl. Create the appropriate pvcalls > > > entries in xenstore. > > > > > > Signed-off-by:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add pvcalls info to xl man page and add missing LIBXL_HAVE_PVCALLS

Add a short entry to the xl.cfg man page about pvcalls. Also add LIBXL_HAVE_PVCALLS to mark the presence of pvcalls support in libxl. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini --- docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5.in | 7 +++ tools/libxl/libxl.h | 7 +++ 2 files changed, 14

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xl/libxl: add pvcalls support

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 03/29/2018 04:07 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Add pvcalls support to libxl and xl. Create the appropriate pvcalls > > entries in xenstore. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > -

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 3/30/18 3:50 AM, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>> On 3/29/18 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen/arm: Add MVEBU UART driver for Armada 3700 SoC

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Amit Tomer wrote: > Hello, > > > I tested this on my board and it works like expected. I would very much > > like to see this driver still in 4.11. > > Thanks for looking into it and Many Thanks for testing it out. FYI the deadline is the end of next week. If you submit a

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On 3/30/18 3:50 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> On 3/29/18 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >>> >>> Long term I think we want to get away from building

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 121336: regressions - FAIL

flight 121336 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121336/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 118324

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v11] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

From: Razvan Cojocaru For the default EPT view we have xc_set_mem_access_multi(), which is able to set an array of pages to an array of access rights with a single hypercall. However, this functionality was lacking for the altp2m subsystem, which could only set page

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 121339: regressions - FAIL

flight 121339 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121339/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 121310 Tests which did not

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 121377: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 121377 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121377/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] xtf: add a msleep helper

This requires importing some of the PV timecounter functionality from FreeBSD in order to access the PV time info. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné --- Cc: Andrew Cooper --- Changes since v1: - New in this version. --- arch/x86/include/arch/lib.h

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xtf: add minimal HPET functionality test

Add a basic HPET functionality test, note that this test requires the HPET to support level triggered interrupts. Further improvements should add support for interrupt delivery, and testing all the available timers. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné --- Cc: Andrew Cooper

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/vpt: execute callbacks for masked interrupts

Execute periodic_time callbacks even if the interrupt is not actually injected because the IRQ is masked. Current callbacks from emulated timer devices only update emulated registers, which from my reading of the specs should happen regardless of whether the interrupt has been injected or not.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] hpet: add support for level triggered interrupts

Hello, Patch 1 is a pre-requisite for patch 2 that adds support for level triggered interrupts to the emulated HPET code. Thanks, Roger. Roger Pau Monne (2): x86/vpt: execute callbacks for masked interrupts vhpet: add support for level triggered interrupts xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c | 46

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6] new config option vtsc_tolerance_khz to avoid TSC emulation

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 02:09:43PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > index dbb287d6fe..8b898bb3c9 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ libxl_domain_build_info =

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xl/libxl: add pvcalls support

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:25:34AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Add pvcalls support to libxl and xl. Create the appropriate pvcalls > > entries in xenstore. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

On 03/30/2018 02:16 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Petre Pircalabu > wrote: >> From: Razvan Cojocaru >> >> For the default EPT view we have xc_set_mem_access_multi(), which >> is able to set an array of pages to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > From: Razvan Cojocaru > > For the default EPT view we have xc_set_mem_access_multi(), which > is able to set an array of pages to an array of access rights with > a single hypercall.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen/arm: Add MVEBU UART driver for Armada 3700 SoC

Hello, > I tested this on my board and it works like expected. I would very much > like to see this driver still in 4.11. Thanks for looking into it and Many Thanks for testing it out. > > Some (minor) comments on the code below. > > On 16/03/18 17:34, Amit Singh Tomar wrote: >> This patch adds

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

On 03/30/2018 11:14 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 03/30/2018 01:03 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 03/30/2018 07:34 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >>> On 03/13/2018 07:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:22:20PM +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: [...] Tabs here. With

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

On 03/30/2018 01:03 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On 03/30/2018 07:34 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >> On 03/13/2018 07:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:22:20PM +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: >>> [...] >>> Tabs here. >>> >>> With this fixed, libxc bits: >>> >>> Acked-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

On 03/30/2018 07:34 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 03/13/2018 07:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:22:20PM +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: >> [...] >> Tabs here. >> >> With this fixed, libxc bits: >> >> Acked-by: Wei Liu > > We seem to have (again) arrived

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:33:02PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:14:08PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 29,

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 121338: all pass - PUSHED

flight 121338 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121338/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 0760ed06a139aa6f84568147e3ee4fe919469238 baseline version: ovmf

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 02:35:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> George Dunlap 03/29/18 7:06 PM >>> > >On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > >> Seabios has bumped their requirement to 4.6 (released 7 years ago). We > >> either need to bump

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:33:02PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:14:08PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > >> > On Thu, Mar

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v19 06/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: add a new mappable resource type...

>>> Paul Durrant 03/29/18 5:49 PM >>> >... XENMEM_resource_ioreq_server > >This patch adds support for a new resource type that can be mapped using >the XENMEM_acquire_resource memory op. > >If an emulator makes use of this resource type then, instead of mapping >gfns,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v19 01/11] x86/hvm/ioreq: maintain an array of ioreq servers rather than a list

>>> Paul Durrant 03/29/18 5:49 PM >>> >v19: >- Improve comments. >- Add missing checks for whether an ioreq server is enabled before >sending emulation requests. It would have been nice if this (for the broadcasting case) unrelated (but intentional) change was mentioned

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 9:50 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> On 3/29/18 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >>> >>> Long term I think we

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 3/29/18 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >> >> Long term I think we want to get away from building seabios ourselves >> altogether; but it's a bit

Re: [Xen-devel] Upping gcc requirement for x86

>>> George Dunlap 03/29/18 7:06 PM >>> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >> Seabios has bumped their requirement to 4.6 (released 7 years ago). We >> either need to bump our too or have a separate entry for seabios. > >RHEL / CentOS 6 are

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xl/libxl: add pvcalls support

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Add pvcalls support to libxl and xl. Create the appropriate pvcalls > entries in xenstore. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini Acked-by: Wei Liu Please also submit a doc patch. >

[Xen-devel] [rumprun test] 121340: regressions - FAIL

flight 121340 rumprun real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121340/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-rumprun 6 rumprun-buildfail REGR. vs. 106754 build-i386-rumprun

Re: [Xen-devel] Need some advices on how to workaround a hardware bug

>>> Chao Gao 03/30/18 7:19 AM >>> >I met an EPT violation and then the guest was destroyed by Xen >after assigning a device to the guest. After some investigation, I found >it is caused by the device isn't a standard PCI device -- its MSI-x PBA >locates in the same 4k-byte

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 121333: regressions - FAIL

flight 121333 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/121333/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 121270 Tests which did not

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading

From: Gao Chao This patch is to backport microcode improvement patches from linux kernel. Below are the original patches description: commit a5321aec6412b20b5ad15db2d6b916c05349dbff Author: Ashok Raj Date: Wed Feb 28 11:28:46 2018 +0100

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v10] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

On 03/13/2018 07:44 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:22:20PM +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > [...] > Tabs here. > > With this fixed, libxc bits: > > Acked-by: Wei Liu We seem to have (again) arrived at an impasse with this patch. To summarize, the original