flight 129688 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129688/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 129540
test-amd64-i386
flight 129680 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129680/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs.
125898
test-amd64-
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict
testid debian-hvm-install
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditiona
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 00:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Firstly, Xen fails to bring up any other CPUs but the one it is booting on:
> >
> > (XEN) Bringing up CPU1
> > (XEN) Failed to bring up CPU1
> > (XEN) Failed to bring up CPU 1 (error -9)
> > (XEN) Bringing up CPU2
> > (XEN) Failed t
flight 129676 xen-4.10-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129676/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 10 debian-hvm-install
fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-l
flight 129769 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129769/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
flight 129651 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129651/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs.
129514
Tests which d
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/xen: Fix boot loader version reported for PVH guests
to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/xen: Fix boot loader version reported for PVH guests
to the 4.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/xen: Fix boot loader version reported for PVH guests
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
flight 129764 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129764/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
flight 129756 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129756/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
On 09/11/2018 23:23, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I just noticed this patch -- I missed it because the cover message
> seemed far more harmless so I didn't notice this change.
>
> THIS PATCH IS FATALLY WRONG AND NEEDS TO BE IMMEDIATELY REVERTED BEFORE
> ANYONE STARTS RELYING ON IT; IT HAS THE POTENTIAL
The pull request you sent on Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:46:12 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git
> for-linus-4.20a-rc2-tag
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/ab6e1f378f546b0caa616ac0fcc730725cc2d222
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot,
flight 129753 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129753/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
Linus,
Please git pull the following tag:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git
for-linus-4.20a-rc2-tag
xen: fixes for 4.20-rc2
It contains several fixes, mostly for rather recent regressions when
running under Xen.
Thanks.
Juergen
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/page.h | 35
flight 129749 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129749/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
flight 129594 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129594/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 129353
Tests which did not suc
flight 75585 distros-debian-stretch real [real]
http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/75585/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-amd64-stretch-netboot-pvgrub 11 guest-start fail blocked in
75566
test-amd64-amd64-i386-stretch-
flight 129745 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129745/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:08:05PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * Promise that we will set errno to ENOENT if the server is not
> yet set up.
> * Arrange that all ENOENT returns other than from the read of ring-ref
> are turned into EIO, logging when we do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
>
flight 129587 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129587/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-boot fail REGR.
vs. 129313
test-amd64-
On 10/11/2018 08:16, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/9/18 11:02 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. We know that and it is resolved by:
>>>
>>> a) the length field in setup_header;
>>> b) the "sentinel" field which catches legacy non-compliant bootloaders.
>>
>> Doesn't help for boot loaders readin
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:07:57PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Delete 11 entirely formulaic conditional calls to
> xtl_createlogger_stdiostream(stderr, XTL_PROGRESS, 0);
> and associated logger_tofree variables, error handling, etc.
>
> No overall functional change, although some memory allocati
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 05:07:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Previously xtl_log, xtl_logv and xtl_progress would all crash if
> passed logger=NULL. Have the use the default logger instead.
> This is more convenient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
> CC: Wei Liu
Reviewed-by: Marek Marczykowski
flight 129742 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/129742/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-amd64
26 matches
Mail list logo
