Followup of yesterday's design session "refactoring the REST"

2020-07-08 Thread Jürgen Groß
Yesterday's design session at Xen Developer Summit "Hypervisor Team: .." had one topic regarding whether we should find specific maintainers of all the files currently assigned to "THE REST" in order to lower the amount of reviews for those assigned to be "THE REST" maintainers. Modifying the

[xen-4.9-testing test] 151735: tolerable trouble: fail/pass/starved - PUSHED

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151735 xen-4.9-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151735/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 15 guest-saverestore.2 fail in 151716 pass in 151735

[xen-4.10-testing test] 151728: tolerable trouble: fail/pass/starved - PUSHED

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151728 xen-4.10-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151728/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 14 guest-saverestore.2 fail in 151713 pass in 151728

[libvirt test] 151729: regressions - FAIL

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151729 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151729/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 22 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 151496

[linux-linus test] 151722: regressions - FAIL

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151722 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151722/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 151214 build-i386-pvops

[qemu-mainline test] 151721: regressions - FAIL

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151721 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151721/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.

[ovmf test] 151725: all pass - PUSHED

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151725 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151725/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf bdafda8c457eb90c65f37026589b54258300f05c baseline version: ovmf

[xen-unstable test] 151719: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151719 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151719/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 151696

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Perfect, thank you! On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, George Dunlap wrote: > OK, I made that restriction; the resulting schedule seems OK to me. :-) > > -George > > > On Jul 8, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Stefano Stabellini > > wrote: > >> > >> On

Re: [PATCH] x86/mtrr: Drop workaround for old 32bit CPUs

2020-07-08 Thread Jan Beulich
On 08.07.2020 12:14, Andrew Cooper wrote: > This logic is dead as Xen is 64bit-only these days. Ah, yes, this should have long been gone. Jan

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread George Dunlap
OK, I made that restriction; the resulting schedule seems OK to me. :-) -George > On Jul 8, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Stefano Stabellini > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:20:47AM -0700,

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:20:47AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! Just submitted the proposal. > > > > > > It would be really great to have Bobby attend (on CC) as he has

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:20:47AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > Thanks! Just submitted the proposal. > > > > It would be really great to have Bobby attend (on CC) as he has been > > working on it. I'm not sure what timezone he is in though. >

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Bobby Eshleman
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:20:47AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: > > Thanks! Just submitted the proposal. > > It would be really great to have Bobby attend (on CC) as he has been > working on it. I'm not sure what timezone he is in though. > Hey Alistair, I am on the west coast in the USA,

Re: PCI passthrough on arm Design Session MoM

2020-07-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 12:55:36PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote: > Hi, > > Here are the notes we took during the design session around PCI devices > passthrough on Arm. > Feel free to comment or add anything :-) > > Bertrand > > PCI devices passthrough on Arm Design Session >

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:21 AM George Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Jul 8, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:11 AM Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >> > >> Adding George in case he can help with the session placement. > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:55:06AM

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread George Dunlap
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:11 AM Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> >> Adding George in case he can help with the session placement. >> >> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:55:06AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> I'm not sure if there

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Alistair Francis
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:11 AM Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > Adding George in case he can help with the session placement. > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:55:06AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I'm not sure if there is a better way to suggest a design session but > > can we have a

[qemu-mainline bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 testid windows-install Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git Tree: qemu

Re: Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
Adding George in case he can help with the session placement. On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:55:06AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote: > Hey, > > I'm not sure if there is a better way to suggest a design session but > can we have a Xen on RISC-V discussion tomorrow at the Xen Design > Summit? I think

Xen and RISC-V Design Session

2020-07-08 Thread Alistair Francis
Hey, I'm not sure if there is a better way to suggest a design session but can we have a Xen on RISC-V discussion tomorrow at the Xen Design Summit? Preferably in a later slot as the early slots are very early for me. Alistair

PCI passthrough on arm Design Session MoM

2020-07-08 Thread Bertrand Marquis
Hi, Here are the notes we took during the design session around PCI devices passthrough on Arm. Feel free to comment or add anything :-) Bertrand PCI devices passthrough on Arm Design Session == Date: 7/7/2020 - X86 VPCI support is for the PVH guest . -

Re: [PATCH] trivial: Remove trailing whitespaces

2020-07-08 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:31:21AM -0700, no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200706162300.1084753-1-dinec...@redhat.com/ > > > > Hi, > > This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for > more information: > > Subject: [PATCH]

[xen-4.9-testing test] 151716: regressions - trouble: fail/pass/starved

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151716 xen-4.9-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151716/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 15 guest-saverestore.2 fail REGR. vs. 151223

Re: [PATCH] trivial: Remove trailing whitespaces

2020-07-08 Thread Roman Bolshakov
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:23:00PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > There are a number of unnecessary trailing whitespaces that have > accumulated over time in the source code. They cause stray changes > in patches if you use tools that automatically remove them. > > Tested by doing a `git

Re: [PATCH] x86/mtrr: Drop workaround for old 32bit CPUs

2020-07-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:52:57AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/07/2020 11:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:14:43AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >>/* Check upper bits of base and last are equal and lower bits are 0 > >>for base and 1 for last */ > >>

Re: [PATCH] x86/mtrr: Drop workaround for old 32bit CPUs

2020-07-08 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 08/07/2020 11:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:14:43AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> This logic is dead as Xen is 64bit-only these days. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper > Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, >> --- >> CC: Jan Beulich >> CC: Wei Liu >> CC: Roger

Re: [PATCH] x86/mtrr: Drop workaround for old 32bit CPUs

2020-07-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:14:43AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > This logic is dead as Xen is 64bit-only these days. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné > --- > CC: Jan Beulich > CC: Wei Liu > CC: Roger Pau Monné > --- > xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/generic.c | 17

[PATCH] x86/mtrr: Drop workaround for old 32bit CPUs

2020-07-08 Thread Andrew Cooper
This logic is dead as Xen is 64bit-only these days. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper --- CC: Jan Beulich CC: Wei Liu CC: Roger Pau Monné --- xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/generic.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mtrr/generic.c

[xen-unstable-coverity test] 151733: all pass - PUSHED

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151733 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151733/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 3fdc211b01b29f252166937238efe02d15cb5780 baseline version: xen

[xen-4.12-testing test] 151715: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-07-08 Thread osstest service owner
flight 151715 xen-4.12-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151715/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow217 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail like 151388 test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim12

Re: [PATCH v2] xen/displif: Protocol version 2

2020-07-08 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, Paul! On 7/2/20 11:42 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 02.07.20 09:59, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >> >> On 7/2/20 10:20 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: >>> On 01.07.20 14:07, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: On 7/1/20 1:46 PM, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 01.07.20 09:19, Oleksandr Andrushchenko