flight 151968 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151968/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
151065
test-amd64-amd
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 17:55, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:21:57PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 17 Jul 2020, at 16:31, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:22:19PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 13:16, Roger Pau Monné w
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 18:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:47:25PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 17 Jul 2020, at 17:26, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 17/07/2020 15:47, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> * Dom0Less implementation will require to have the capacity inside
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 21:17, Oleksandr wrote:
>
>
> On 17.07.20 19:18, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hello Bertrand
>
> [two threads with the same name are shown in my mail client, so not
> completely sure I am asking in the correct one]
>
>>
>>
>> On 17/07/2020 17:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>
Hi,
On 17/07/2020 16:47, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 17 Jul 2020, at 17:26, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/07/2020 15:47, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
pci=[ "PCI_SPEC_STRING", "PCI_SPEC_STRING", ...]
Guest will be only able to access the assigned devices and see the bridges.
Guest will not be able
On 18/07/2020 10:55, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 17 Jul 2020, at 18:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:47:25PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 17 Jul 2020, at 17:26, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/07/2020 15:47, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
* Dom0Less implementation will requ
On 17/07/2020 20:17, Oleksandr wrote:
I would like to clarify regarding an IOMMU driver changes which should
be done to support PCI pass-through properly.
Design document mentions about SMMU, but Xen also supports IPMMU-VMSA
(under tech preview now). It would be really nice if the required
Hi,
On 17/07/2020 17:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
IIRC Julien even said that Arm was likely to require much less traps
than x86 for accesses to MSI and MSI-X since you could allow untrusted
guests to write directly to the registers as there's another piece of
hardware that would already translate
flight 151975 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151975/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 151957
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64
flight 151978 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151978/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 151214
build-i386-pvops
flight 151982 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151982/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 3d8327496762b4f2a54c9bafd7a214314ec28e9e
baseline version:
ovmf 6ff53d2a13740e39dea11
flight 151984 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151984/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-i386-libvirt
Ian Jackson, le mer. 15 juil. 2020 17:25:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> From: Juergen Gross
>
> stubdom/mini-os.mk should contain paths used by Mini-OS when built as
> stubdom.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault
> ---
> stubdom/mini-os.mk | 17 +
> 1 file ch
Juergen Gross, le lun. 13 juil. 2020 10:42:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> Mini-OS shouldn't use Xen internal paths for building. Import the
> needed paths from Xen and fall back to the current values only if
> the import was not possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault
> -
At 12:00 +0200 on 15 Jul (1594814409), Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... by the very fact that they're 3-level specific, while PV always gets
> run in 4-level mode. This requires adding some seemingly redundant
> #ifdef-s - some of them will be possible to drop again once 2- and
> 3-level guest code doesn't
At 11:56 +0200 on 15 Jul (1594814214), Jan Beulich wrote:
> This in particular goes a few small steps further towards proper
> !HVM and !PV config handling (i.e. no carrying of unnecessary
> baggage).
>
> 1: x86/shadow: dirty VRAM tracking is needed for HVM only
> 2: x86/shadow: shadow_table[] nee
Ian Jackson, le mer. 15 juil. 2020 17:25:07 +0100, a ecrit:
> From: Juergen Gross
>
> Today tools/libxc needs to be built after tools/libs as libxenctrl is
> depending on some libraries in tools/libs. This in turn blocks moving
> other libraries depending on libxenctrl below tools/libs.
>
> So c
flight 151988 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151988/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
151065
test-amd64-amd
Drop the repeated word "of" in a comment.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
Cc: Juergen Gross
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
---
include/uapi/xen/gntdev.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-next-20200717.orig/include/uapi/xen/gntdev.h
+++ linu
(Roger, question for you at the very end)
On 7/17/20 3:10 PM, Anchal Agarwal wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 05:18:08PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender an
On 7/16/20 5:06 AM, Qinglang Miao wrote:
> From: Chen Huang
>
> Use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Huang
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky
flight 151990 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151990/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail pass in 151975
Tests which did not succeed, but
flight 151992 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151992/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 151214
Tests which did not
23 matches
Mail list logo
