[ovmf test] 156806: all pass - PUSHED

flight 156806 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156806/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf d448574e73108f031ea6b02994f2579bb574785a baseline version: ovmf 5e9a8a6dfb152472c5d12

[linux-linus test] 156804: regressions - FAIL

flight 156804 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156804/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[qemu-mainline test] 156803: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 156803 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156803/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm broken test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 19 guest-st

[linux-linus test] 156801: regressions - FAIL

flight 156801 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156801/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[xen-unstable test] 156799: tolerable FAIL

flight 156799 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156799/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail pass in 156737 Tests which did not succeed, but

Re: [SPECIFICATION RFC] The firmware and bootloader log specification

Hi Daniel, I think this is a good idea. Alas, as I hear for the first time about it, I lack any context of prior discussions / context. So bear with me, if I ask things that have already been answered. On 14.11.20 00:52, Daniel Kiper wrote: > The goal is to pass all logs produced by various boot

Re: Duplicated ABI entries - Was: Re: [PATCH v2 20/39] docs: ABI: testing: make the files compatible with ReST output

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:26:58 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Em Sun, 8 Nov 2020 16:56:21 + > Jonathan Cameron escreveu: > > > > PS.: the IIO subsystem is the one that currently has more duplicated > > > ABI entries: > > > $ ./scripts/get_abi.pl validate 2>&1|grep ii

[qemu-mainline test] 156768: regressions - FAIL

flight 156768 qemu-mainline real [real] flight 156802 qemu-mainline real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156768/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156802/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be

[libvirt test] 156800: regressions - FAIL

flight 156800 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156800/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-amd64-libvirt

[linux-linus test] 156747: regressions - FAIL

flight 156747 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156747/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[ovmf test] 156786: all pass - PUSHED

flight 156786 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156786/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 5e9a8a6dfb152472c5d12a3940069b16c774f0fc baseline version: ovmf 662b42db76a5b195c3aa9