[qemu-mainline test] 162778: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162778 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162778/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 16 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 152631 test-amd64-am

Re: [xen-unstable test] 162771: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread Juergen Gross
On 14.06.21 04:21, osstest service owner wrote: flight 162771 xen-unstable real [real] flight 162783 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162771/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162783/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and

Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support.

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 08:28:01AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I think merging this with the next two patches would be a little more > clear. Sorry, I mean the next patch and the previous one.

Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support.

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I think merging this with the next two patches would be a little more clear.

Re: [PATCH v9 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:54PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > Add a new function, release_slots, to make the code reusable for supporting > different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool. > > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang > --- > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 35 ---

Re: [PATCH v9 08/14] swiotlb: Move alloc_size to find_slots

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:53PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > Move the maintenance of alloc_size to find_slots for better code > reusability later. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH v9 07/14] swiotlb: Bounce data from/to restricted DMA pool if available

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:52PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > Regardless of swiotlb setting, the restricted DMA pool is preferred if > available. > > The restricted DMA pools provide a basic level of protection against the > DMA overwriting buffer contents at unexpected times. However, to protec

Re: [PATCH v9 06/14] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> kernel/dma/direct.c | 2 +- > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 4 ++-- > 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c > index ce6b664b10aa..

Re: [PATCH v9 05/14] swiotlb: Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig

Re: [PATCH v9 04/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool initialization

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:49PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > Add the initialization function to create restricted DMA pools from > matching reserved-memory nodes. Bisection hazard: we should only add the new config option when the code is actually read to be used. So this patch should move to

Re: [PATCH v9 03/14] swiotlb: Set dev->dma_io_tlb_mem to the swiotlb pool used

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:33:15PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > I'm not sure if this would break arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c > swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size is called here > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13-rc5/source/arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c#L60 It will. It will also break all n

Re: [PATCH v9 02/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_create_debugfs

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:47PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > Split the debugfs creation to make the code reusable for supporting > different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool. > > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang > --- > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 23 --- > 1 file chang

Re: [PATCH v9 01/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions

2021-06-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:26:46PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote: > + spin_lock_init(&mem->lock); > + for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) { > + mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i); > + mem->slots[i].orig_addr = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR; > + mem->slo

Re: [OSSTEST PATCH] ts-xen-build: Turn on CONFIG_PV32 again

2021-06-13 Thread Jan Beulich
On 11.06.2021 19:02, Ian Jackson wrote: > CC: George Dunlap > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson FWIW: Acked-by: Jan Beulich

[linux-linus test] 162776: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162776 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162776/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[ovmf test] 162781: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162781 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162781/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[xen-unstable test] 162771: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162771 xen-unstable real [real] flight 162783 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162771/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162783/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be r

[ovmf test] 162774: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162774 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162774/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[qemu-mainline test] 162762: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162762 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162762/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 16 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 152631 test-amd64-am

[linux-linus test] 162757: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162757 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162757/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

[ovmf test] 162769: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162769 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162769/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[xen-unstable test] 162755: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162755 xen-unstable real [real] flight 162767 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162755/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162767/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be r

[ovmf test] 162758: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162758 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162758/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[xen-unstable-coverity test] 162765: all pass - PUSHED

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162765 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162765/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 93031fbe9f4c341a2e7950a088025ea550291433 baseline version: xen e4fe

[libvirt test] 162760: regressions - FAIL

2021-06-13 Thread osstest service owner
flight 162760 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162760/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-amd64-libvirt

Regression in at least 5.10.y and mainline: Firewire audio interface fails to work properly (when booted under Xen)

2021-06-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 06:05:37AM +1000, 小太 wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 5.10.40-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > X-Debbugs-Cc: nos...@kota.moe > > After updating from linux-image-5.10.0-6-amd64, jackd now fails to sync to my > DICE-compatible firewire audio interface (Profi