flight 170659 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170659/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170651 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170651/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 170628
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20
flight 170658 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170658/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170656 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170656/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170655 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170655/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170654 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170654/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170647 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170647/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 170586
flight 170653 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170653/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170652 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170652/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170650 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170650/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170635 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170635/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 170578
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16
flight 170628 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170628/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 170592
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20
flight 170649 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170649/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170648 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170648/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170646 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170646/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
On 25/03/2022 14:36, Julien Grall wrote:
be loaded at (512GB + 2MB). This requires a slight tweak of the boot
code as XEN_VIRT_START cannot be used as an immediate.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
TODO:
- I vaguely recall that one of the early platform we
supported add
flight 170616 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170616/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 broken
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2
flight 170645 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170645/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170644 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170644/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170643 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170643/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
On 4/28/22 10:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
The latest with commit bdd8b6c98239 ("drm/i915: replace X86_FEATURE_PAT
with pat_enabled()") pat_enabled() returning false (because of PAT
initialization being suppressed in the absence of MTRRs being announced
to be available) has become a problem: The
flight 170640 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170640/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
On 5/3/22 9:22 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Some drivers are using pat_enabled() in order to test availability of
special caching modes (WC and UC-). This will lead to false negatives
in case the system was booted e.g. with the "nopat" variant and the
BIOS did setup the PAT MSR supporting the
flight 170638 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170638/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170624 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170624/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
flight 170637 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170637/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
On 20.05.22 16:48, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 5/20/2022 10:06 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.05.2022 15:33, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>>> On 5/20/2022 5:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.05.2022 10:30, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 5/20/2022 2:59 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>> On
Hi,
On 20/05/2022 13:09, Julien Grall wrote:
+void __init pmap_unmap(const void *p)
+{
+unsigned int idx;
+unsigned int slot = virt_to_fix((unsigned long)p);
+
+ASSERT(system_state < SYS_STATE_smp_boot);
+ASSERT(slot >= FIXMAP_PMAP_BEGIN && slot <= FIXMAP_PMAP_END);
+
flight 170636 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170636/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170611 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170611/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 broken
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw
flight 170634 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170634/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170632 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170632/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
flight 170630 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170630/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
The current implementation of the 20_linux_xen script implements its
menu items sorting in bash with a quadratic algorithm, calling "sed",
"sort", "head", and "grep" to compare versions between individual lines,
which is annoyingly slow for kernel developers who can easily end up
with 50-100
flight 170627 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/170627/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-i386
35 matches
Mail list logo