[qemu-mainline test] 172495: regressions - FAIL

flight 172495 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172495/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172123

[ovmf test] 172501: regressions - FAIL

flight 172501 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172501/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

[linux-5.4 test] 172489: regressions - FAIL

flight 172489 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172489/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172128 build-amd64-libvirt

[ovmf test] 172500: regressions - FAIL

flight 172500 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172500/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

[ovmf test] 172497: regressions - FAIL

flight 172497 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172497/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

Re: PING [PATCH 3/3] x86: decouple pat and mtrr handling

On 8/13/2022 5:48 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:40:34PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > > I did a search for Juergen Gross on lkml and he is active submitting and > > reviewing patches during the past few weeks. However, he is ignoring > > comments on his patch to fix

Re: PING [PATCH 3/3] x86: decouple pat and mtrr handling

On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:40:34PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > I did a search for Juergen Gross on lkml and he is active submitting and > reviewing patches during the past few weeks. However, he is ignoring > comments on his patch to fix this regression. Please stop this non-sense and be

[linux-linus test] 172485: regressions - FAIL

flight 172485 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172485/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172133

Re: PING [PATCH 3/3] x86: decouple pat and mtrr handling

On 8/13/2022 1:20 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 12:56:44PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > > Why has Juergen not at least responded in some way to the > > comments that Boris has made here? Why has Boris not > > pinged Juergen by now, > > How about: it is summer here and

[ovmf test] 172494: regressions - FAIL

flight 172494 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172494/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

[qemu-mainline test] 172480: regressions - FAIL

flight 172480 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172480/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172123

[ovmf test] 172490: regressions - FAIL

flight 172490 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172490/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

Re: PING [PATCH 3/3] x86: decouple pat and mtrr handling

On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 12:56:44PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > Why has Juergen not at least responded in some way to the > comments that Boris has made here? Why has Boris not > pinged Juergen by now, How about: it is summer here and people usually take their vacations during that time and

Re: PING [PATCH 3/3] x86: decouple pat and mtrr handling

On 7/19/22 11:15 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:25:49PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Today PAT is usable only with MTRR being active, with some nasty tweaks > > to make PAT usable when running as Xen PV guest, which doesn't support > > MTRR. > > > > The reason for this

Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: make pat and mtrr independent from each other

On 7/17/22 3:55 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi Juergen! > > On 15.07.22 16:25, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Today PAT can't be used without MTRR being available, unless MTRR is at > > least configured via CONFIG_MTRR and the system is running as Xen PV > > guest. In this case PAT is automatically

[linux-5.4 bisection] complete build-arm64-libvirt

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-arm64-libvirt testid libvirt-build Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_keycodemapdb https://gitlab.com/keycodemap/keycodemapdb.git Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git Tree: qemuu

[ovmf test] 172486: regressions - FAIL

flight 172486 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172486/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

[linux-5.4 test] 172476: regressions - FAIL

flight 172476 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172476/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 broken in 172453 build-i386-libvirt6

[xen-unstable test] 172471: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 172471 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172471/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw 1

[linux-linus test] 172463: regressions - FAIL

flight 172463 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172463/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172133

[ovmf test] 172479: regressions - FAIL

flight 172479 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172479/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

[libvirt test] 172473: regressions - FAIL

flight 172473 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172473/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-armhf-libvirt

Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: gic: Fix MISRA C 2012 Rule 20.7 violation

Hi Julien, On 8/10/22 13:24, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Xenia, Thank for your effort to make Xen MISRA compliant. Personally, I find quite difficult to follow what's going on with dozen of single patches. It is also makes more difficult for a committer to apply them. For instance, tools like

[qemu-mainline test] 172459: regressions - FAIL

flight 172459 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172459/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172123

[ovmf test] 172475: regressions - FAIL

flight 172475 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/172475/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 172136 build-amd64-libvirt

Re: [PATCH] add SPDX to arch/arm/*.c

Hi Stefano, On 13/08/2022 01:59, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Add SPDX license information to all the *.c files under arch/arm. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini --- We need to start from somewhere and I thought arch/arm/*.c would be a good place to start. Thanks for doing it. This will make