On 29-09-23, 07:46, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 29.08.23 14:29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > +static irqreturn_t ioeventfd_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + struct ioreq_port *port = dev_id;
> > + struct privcmd_kernel_ioreq *kioreq = port->kioreq;
> > + struct ioreq *ioreq = &kioreq->io
On 3.10.23 г. 9:24 ч., Xin Li wrote:
This patch set enables the Intel flexible return and event delivery
(FRED) architecture for x86-64.
Which tree is this based on now? I tried running 'b4 diff' but it
complains it can't find some context around arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
. I have the
flight 183265 linux-linus real [real]
flight 183267 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183265/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183267/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-
Hi,
> On Oct 4, 2023, at 04:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Federico Serafini wrote:
>> Add missing parameter names and make function declarations and definitions
>> consistent. No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabell
Hi Roger,
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 23:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>
> Since it was indicated that introducing specific new vCPU ops may be
> beneficial independent of the introduction of a fully physical-
> address-based ABI flavor, here we go. There continue to be a few open
> questions throughout t
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:52:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > If we want to handle such firmware, I think it would be better if we
> > > > provide
> > > > an hypercall that would return the GFN where it is currently mapped.
> > >
> > > Sure,
Hi MISRA C working group (Jan, Roger, Andrew, Julien, Bertrand, George)
in a recent thread Andrew pointed out that the SAF-2-safe tag is
confusing and requested a rename:
https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=169634970821202
As documented by docs/misra/documenting-violations.rst:
- SAF-X-safe: This
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> > On 4 Oct 2023, at 11:29, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > On 04/10/2023 12:06, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> >> Hi Nicola,
> >>> On 4 Oct 2023, at 10:56, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
> >>> On 03/10/2023 9:46 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 03/10/2023 21:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > On 03/10/2023 20:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Michal Orzel wrote:
> > > > > On 03/10/2023 09:44, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> > > > > > G
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > This is not very different here. For Arm we decided to not follow a
> > > behavior
> > > that I consider incorrect and potentially more harmful than trying to
> > > support bootloader not removing the shared page.
> >
> > I think this is not very frien
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wro
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When using UEFI there's RAM that will always be
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:54 AM Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>
> From: Jan Beulich
>
> In preparation of the introduction of new vCPU operations allowing to
> register the respective areas (one of the two is x86-specific) by
> guest-physical address, add the necessary fork handling (with the
> backing f
Heavily trimming earlier messages. Also doing one response to cover
several items. Hopefully I'm not missing something which needs a
response.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> > On 04/10/2023
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:29:18 +0300 David Kahurani wrote:
> If XEN_NETBK_LEGACY_SLOTS_MAX and MAX_SKB_FRAGS have a difference of
> more than 1, with MAX_SKB_FRAGS being the lesser value, it opens up a
> path for null-dereference. It was also noted that some distributions
> were modifying upstream be
flight 183263 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183263/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf d073a545119140070c83e4b2b249bf0448c6f89e
baseline version:
ovmf 1497c4b074946f3ad9d46
On 7/20/23 05:20, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/07/2023 18:35, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
>> On 7/13/23 14:40, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Stewart,
>>>
>>> On 07/07/2023 02:47, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
From: Rahul Singh
Setting CONFIG_PCI_PASSTHROUGH=y will enable PCI passthro
Hi,
On 04/10/2023 15:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:06:14PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Neither of the two behaviors help the users. In fact, I think they only make
the experience worse because you don't know when the issue will happen.
AFAICT, there is no way for an HVM
Hi,
On 03/10/2023 21:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
On 03/10/2023 20:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 03/10/2023 09:44, Luca Fancellu wrote:
Given that the status after the move to common of the above functions is
On 04.10.23 15:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello Roger
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:42:32AM +, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04.10.23 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> Hello all.
>>
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:1
Hi Roger,
On 02/10/2023 16:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
From: Jan Beulich
Switch to using map_guest_area(). Noteworthy differences from
map_vcpu_info():
- remote vCPU-s are paused rather than checked for being down (which in
principle can change right after the check),
- the domain lock is ta
On 04/10/2023 09:42, Andrii Chepurnyi wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
On 10/3/23 16:49, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 03/10/2023 14:19, Andrii Chepurnyi wrote:
For read operations, there's a potential issue when the data field
of the ioreq struct is partially updated in the response. To address
this, zero
From: Rahul Singh
Current code skip the mapping for PCI bridge MMIO region to dom0 when
pci_passthrough_enabled flag is set. Mapping should be skip when
has_vpci(d) is enabled for the domain, as we need to skip the mapping
only when VPCI handler are registered for ECAM.
Signed-off-by: Rahul Sing
From: Rahul Singh
Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh
---
v4->v5:
* new patch
---
xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
index 05429030b539..df8f045198a3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
From: Rahul Singh
This enables us to use IOMMU + PCI in dom0 without having to specify
"pci-passthrough=yes".
This reverts commit 15517ed61f55be6039aedcc99720ee07c772ed44.
---
v4->v5:
* new patch
---
docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc | 7 ---
xen/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h| 12
From: Rahul Singh
Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh
Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand
---
v4->v5:
* deassign from hwdom
* add TODO regarding locking
* fixup after dropping ("xen/arm: Move is_protected flag to struct device")
v3->v4:
* no change
v2->v3:
* rebase
* invoke iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids()
flight 183260 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183260/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 183246
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 15 saveres
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand
---
v4->v5:
* assign device to pdev->domain (usually dom0) by default in add_device() hook
* deassign from hwdom
* rebase on top of ("dynamic node programm
Handle phantom functions in iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(). Each phantom
function will have a unique requestor ID (RID)/BDF. On ARM, we need to
map/translate the RID/BDF to an AXI stream ID for each phantom function
according to the pci-iommu device tree mapping [1]. The RID/BDF -> AXI stream ID
m
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
The main purpose of this patch is to add a way to register PCI device
(which is behind the IOMMU) using the generic PCI-IOMMU DT bindings [1]
before assigning that device to a domain.
This behaves similarly to the existing iommu_add_dt_device API, except it
handles PCI
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
Move code for processing DT IOMMU specifier to a separate helper.
This helper will be re-used for adding PCI devices by the subsequent
patches as we will need exact the same actions for processing
DT PCI-IOMMU specifier.
While at it introduce NO_IOMMU to avoid magic "1
This series introduces SMMU handling for PCIe passthrough on ARM. These patches
and should be able to be upstreamed independently from the vPCI series [1]. See
[2] for notes about test cases.
[1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-08/msg02361.html
[2] https://lists.xenprojec
A device tree node for a PCIe root controller may have an iommu-map property [1]
with a phandle reference to the SMMU node, but not necessarily an iommus
property. In this case, we want to treat it the same as we currently handle
devices with an iommus property: don't pass the iommu related propert
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:06:14PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 14:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55
flight 183259 linux-linus real [real]
flight 183262 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183259/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183262/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 14:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On T
Hello,
On 10/3/23 16:49, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/10/2023 14:19, Andrii Chepurnyi wrote:
>> For read operations, there's a potential issue when the data field
>> of the ioreq struct is partially updated in the response. To address
>> this, zero data field during read operations. This m
> From: Joel Granados
>
> This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which
> will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time
> memory bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Lin
For read operations, there's a potential issue when the data field
of the ioreq struct is partially updated in the response. To address
this, zero data field during read operations. This modification
serves as a safeguard against implementations that may inadvertently
partially update the data fiel
On 10/2/23 2:55 AM, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Joel Granados
>
> This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
> empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which
> will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time
> memory b
From: Jan Beulich
In preparation of the introduction of new vCPU operations allowing to
register the respective areas (one of the two is x86-specific) by
guest-physical address, add the necessary fork handling (with the
backing function yet to be filled in).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Signed-of
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18
flight 183261 xtf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183261/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xtf 8ab636aee07918402d80da2ea605ce449b0fd657
baseline version:
xtf f91cd602586c28f76b04f2
On 05/09/2023 09:31, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
Given its use in the declaration
'DECLARE_BITMAP(features, IOMMU_FEAT_count)' the argument
'bits' has essential type 'enum iommu_feature', which is not
allowed by the Rule as an operand to the addition operator.
Given that its value can be represented by
On 04/10/2023 14:00, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 12:01:21PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:25:58PM -0400, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:07 AM Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 12:01:21PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 09:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:25:58PM -0400, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:07 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Roger,
> > > >
> > > > On 0
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:42:32AM +, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 04.10.23 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 03, 202
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:
On 04/10/2023 12:52, Luca Fancellu wrote:
On 4 Oct 2023, at 11:29, Nicola Vetrini
wrote:
On 04/10/2023 12:06, Luca Fancellu wrote:
Hi Nicola,
On 4 Oct 2023, at 10:56, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 03/10/2023 9:46 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
05.09.2023 15:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
The xen_ram_alloc() call in softmmu/physmem.c is guarded
by checking for xen_enabled(), which evaluate to 'false'
when XEN is not built in. The compiler elide the function
call, and thus the inlined function is not used. Remove it.
I still don't t
On 04.10.23 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello all.
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700,
> On 4 Oct 2023, at 12:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2023 11:52 am, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>
>> From the documentation:
>>
>> In the Xen codebase, these tags will be used to document and suppress
>> findings:
>>
>> - SAF-X-safe: This tag means that the next line of code contains a fi
On 04/10/2023 11:52 am, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> From the documentation:
>
> In the Xen codebase, these tags will be used to document and suppress
> findings:
>
> - SAF-X-safe: This tag means that the next line of code contains a
> finding, but
> the non compliance to the checker is a
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:25:58PM -0400, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:07 AM Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 03/10/2023 15:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:53:11AM -0400, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational
> On 4 Oct 2023, at 11:29, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2023 12:06, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> Hi Nicola,
>>> On 4 Oct 2023, at 10:56, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
>>> On 03/10/2023 9:46 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> As specified in ru
On 04/10/2023 12:06, Luca Fancellu wrote:
Hi Nicola,
On 4 Oct 2023, at 10:56, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 03/10/2023 9:46 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
As specified in rules.rst, these constants can be used
in the code.
Their deviation is no
Hi Nicola,
> On 4 Oct 2023, at 10:56, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
>
> On 03/10/2023 9:46 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>
>>> As specified in rules.rst, these constants can be used
>>> in the code.
>>> Their deviation is now accomplished by using
On 03/10/2023 9:46 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> As specified in rules.rst, these constants can be used
>> in the code.
>> Their deviation is now accomplished by using a SAF comment,
>> rather than an ECLAIR configuration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicola V
flight 183258 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183258/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 xen-install fail pass in 183249
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debian
On 5/9/23 14:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Trivial cleanups which simplify "sysemu/xen.h".
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (3):
sysemu/xen: Remove unuseful CONFIG_USER_ONLY header guard
sysemu/xen: Remove unreachable xen_ram_alloc() code
sysemu/xen: Allow elision of xen_hvm_modified_memory()
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:25:58PM -0400, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:07 AM Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > On 03/10/2023 15:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:53:11AM -0400, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> >
> > Tamas, somehow your e-mails do
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational on Xen/ARM. Current issue is
> > > the changes
65 matches
Mail list logo
