On 2023-10-31 09:28, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 2023-10-31 08:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2023 23:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.10.2023 15:34, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/macros.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/macros.h
@@ -8,8 +8,14 @@
Hi Marek,
> On Oct 31, 2023, at 10:16, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
>
> If system suspends too quickly, the message for the test controller to
> wake up the system may be not sent to the console before suspending.
> This will cause the test to timeout.
>
> Fix this by calling sync on th
On 31.10.2023 10:42, Edwin Torok wrote:
>> On 30 Oct 2023, at 16:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 25.10.2023 21:29, Edwin Török wrote:
>>> Dom0 should always be able to read this MSR: it is useful when
>>> investigating performance issues in production.
>>
>> While I'm not outright opposed, I'm also n
On 31.10.2023 10:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:14:44PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> VERBOSE had ceased to exist already before the introduction of this ELF
>> parsing code.
>>
>> Fixes: 62ba982424cb ("x86: parse Dom0 kernel for PVHv2")
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> A
flight 183624 xen-4.18-testing real [real]
flight 183634 xen-4.18-testing real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183624/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/183634/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
t
> On 30 Oct 2023, at 16:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 25.10.2023 21:29, Edwin Török wrote:
>> Dom0 should always be able to read this MSR: it is useful when
>> investigating performance issues in production.
>
> While I'm not outright opposed, I'm also not convinced. At the very least
> ...
>
> On 30 Oct 2023, at 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 25.10.2023 21:29, Edwin Török wrote:
>> This can be useful if you realize you have to inspect the value of an
>> MSR in production, without having to change into a new Xen first that
>> handles the MSR.
>
> Yet on a non-pinned Dom0 you'd s
Make function defintions and declarations consistent.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini
---
Changes in v2:
- use 'ptr' do denote a const void * parameter.
---
xen/arch/arm/domain_page.c| 10 +-
xen/include/xen/domain_page.h | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 11
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:14:44PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> VERBOSE had ceased to exist already before the introduction of this ELF
> parsing code.
>
> Fixes: 62ba982424cb ("x86: parse Dom0 kernel for PVHv2")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné
Some of the printed informa
On 2023-10-27 22:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The definition of MC_NCLASSES contained a violation of MISRA C:2012
Rule 10.1, therefore by moving it as an enumeration constant resolves
the
violation and makes it more resilient to possible additions to
On 31.10.2023 09:33, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Make function definitions and declarations consistent.
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
> @@ -488,22 +488,22 @@ int set_px_pminfo(uint32_t acpi_id, struct
> xen_processor_performance *dom0_px_
Make function definitions and declarations consistent.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini
---
Changes in v2:
- removed unwanted changes to cpu_callback();
- improved code style.
---
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/cpu_idle.c | 5 +--
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/cpufreq.c | 6 ++--
xen/drivers
On 2023-10-31 08:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2023 23:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.10.2023 15:34, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/macros.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/macros.h
@@ -8,8 +8,14 @@
#define DIV_ROUND(n, d) (((n) + (d) / 2) / (
On 31.10.2023 09:22, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2023-10-30 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence of
On 2023-10-30 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
@@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence of prior declarations is
safe."
-config=MC3R1.R8.4,report
On 2023-10-31 08:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.10.2023 00:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
@@ -163,6 +163
On 2023-10-30 23:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Nicola,
On 30/10/2023 09:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> As stated in rules.rst, functions used only in asm modules
> are allowed to have no prior declaration visible when being
> defined, hence these functio
On 31.10.2023 00:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.10.2023 10:11, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
>>> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ Therefore the absence
On 30.10.2023 23:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 27.10.2023 15:34, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/macros.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/macros.h
>>> @@ -8,8 +8,14 @@
>>> #define DIV_ROUND(n, d) (((n) + (d) / 2) / (d))
>>> #define DIV_ROU
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
