On 21.05.2024 17:33, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.05.2024 04:54, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
>>> @@ -522,9 +522,27 @@ extern struct
flight 186063 xen-4.17-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186063/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 185864
On Tue, 21 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.05.2024 22:28, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 17.05.2024 03:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 16 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 1) In the discussion George claimed that exposing status
On Tue, 21 May 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Neither text_poke() nor watchdog_setup() have return value consulted. Switch
> them to being void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
> ---
> CC: George Dunlap
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Stefano Stabellini
> CC:
On Tue, 21 May 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> These are all either completely unused, or do nothing useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
> ---
> CC: George Dunlap
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Stefano Stabellini
> CC: Julien Grall
> CC: Roberto Bagnara
> CC:
Hi Stefano,
On 5/22/2024 9:16 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
index 56490dbc43..956c11ba13
On Tue, 21 May 2024, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This is simpler and easier for both humans and compilers to read.
>
> It also addresses 6 instances of MISRA R5.3 violation (shadowing of the ptr_
> local variable inside both {put,get}_unaligned()).
>
> No change, not even in the compiled binary.
>
>
On Wed, 22 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote:
> > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
> > > index 56490dbc43..956c11ba13 100644
> > > ---
Hi Julien,
On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
index 56490dbc43..956c11ba13 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
@@ -439,24 +439,33 @@ int
On Tue, 21 May 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> Some MISRA C rules already have no violations in Xen, so they can be
> set as clean.
>
> Reorder the rules in tagging.ecl according to version ordering
> (i.e. sort -V) and split the configuration on multiple lines for
> readability.
>
>
flight 186060 xen-4.18-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186060/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 185865
Some MISRA C rules already have no violations in Xen, so they can be
set as clean.
Reorder the rules in tagging.ecl according to version ordering
(i.e. sort -V) and split the configuration on multiple lines for
readability.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
---
flight 186058 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186058/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 186049
flight 186064 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186064/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
Neither text_poke() nor watchdog_setup() have return value consulted. Switch
them to being void.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
CC: Roberto Bagnara
CC: consult...@bugseng.com
CC: Oleksii Kurochko
---
This is simpler and easier for both humans and compilers to read.
It also addresses 6 instances of MISRA R5.3 violation (shadowing of the ptr_
local variable inside both {put,get}_unaligned()).
No change, not even in the compiled binary.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: George Dunlap
CC:
These are all either completely unused, or do nothing useful.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: George Dunlap
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
CC: Roberto Bagnara
CC: consult...@bugseng.com
CC: Oleksii Kurochko
---
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/config.h | 4
Misc fixes collected during today's call.
Andrew Cooper (3):
xen/lzo: Implement COPY{4,8} using memcpy()
xen/x86: Drop useless non-Kconfig CONFIG_* variables
xen/x86: Address two misc MISRA 17.7 violations
xen/arch/x86/alternative.c| 4 ++--
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/config.h | 4
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.05.2024 04:54, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
> > @@ -522,9 +522,27 @@ extern struct rangeset *mmio_ro_ranges;
> > void memguard_guard_stack(void
On 21.05.2024 04:54, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mm.h
> @@ -522,9 +522,27 @@ extern struct rangeset *mmio_ro_ranges;
> void memguard_guard_stack(void *p);
> void memguard_unguard_stack(void *p);
>
> +/*
> + * Add more
flight 186062 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186062/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
flight 186057 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186057/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 186025
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15
Hi Stewart,
On 17/05/2024 18:06, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
From: Volodymyr Babchuk
Guest can try to read config space using different access sizes: 8,
16, 32, 64 bits. We need to take this into account when we are
returning an error back to MMIO handler, otherwise it is possible to
provide
On 2024-05-21 00:35, Henry Wang wrote:
With the XEN_DOMCTL_dt_overlay DOMCTL added, users should be able to
attach/detach devices from the provided DT overlay to domains.
Support this by introducing a new set of "xl dt-overlay" commands and
related documentation, i.e. "xl dt-overlay
flight 186052 linux-linus real [real]
flight 186061 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186052/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186061/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
On 2024-05-21 00:35, Henry Wang wrote:
Currently, the number of SPIs allocated to the domain is only
configurable for Dom0less DomUs. Xen domains are supposed to be
platform agnostics and therefore the numbers of SPIs for libxl
guests should not be based on the hardware.
Introduce a new xl
Hi,
On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote:
From: Vikram Garhwal
Currently, routing/removing physical interrupts are only allowed at
the domain creation/destroy time. For use cases such as dynamic device
tree overlay adding/removing, the routing/removing of physical IRQ to
running domains
On 16.05.2024 01:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
>> of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
>> macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to
On 16.05.2024 01:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
>> of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
>> macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to
On 16.05.2024 01:18, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
>> of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
>> macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to
On 16.05.2024 01:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
>> of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
>> macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to
On 17.05.2024 15:54, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> To avoid the compilation error below, it is needed to update to places
> in common/page_alloc.c where flsl() is used as now flsl() returns unsigned
> int:
>
> ./include/xen/kernel.h:18:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer types
> lacks a cast
On 17.05.2024 15:54, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> The following generic functions were introduced:
> * test_bit
> * generic__test_and_set_bit
> * generic__test_and_clear_bit
> * generic__test_and_change_bit
>
> These functions and macros can be useful for architectures
> that don't have
On 18.05.2024 13:02, Petr Beneš wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -685,6 +685,18 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +if ( config->nr_altp2m && !hvm_altp2m_supported() )
> +
On 17.05.2024 15:33, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Enabling it using an HVM param is fragile, and complicates the logic when
> deciding whether options that interact with altp2m can also be enabled.
>
> Leave the HVM param value for consumption by the guest, but prevent it from
> being set. Enabling
On 21.05.2024 12:03, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:21:35AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.05.2024 12:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:07:50PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.05.2024 15:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at
On 21.05.2024 12:00, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> 21.05.24 09:05, Jan Beulich:
>>> This is because MCG_LMCE_P is defined in arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/x86_mca.h
>>> -- so either MCG_LMCE_P (+ a bunch of MCG_* declarations) has to be
>>> moved to common header to be accessible, or local x86_mca.h got to be
>>>
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:21:35AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.05.2024 12:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:07:50PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 06.05.2024 15:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On
21.05.24 09:05, Jan Beulich:
This is because MCG_LMCE_P is defined in arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/x86_mca.h
-- so either MCG_LMCE_P (+ a bunch of MCG_* declarations) has to be
moved to common header to be accessible, or local x86_mca.h got to be
included from common arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h.
As for
flight 186056 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186056/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
On 16.05.2024 17:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 16.05.2024 15:22, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
>>> @@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@ static int __init cf_check setup_dump_irqs(void)
>>> }
>>>
On 16.05.2024 18:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 16.05.2024 17:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.05.2024 15:22, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> @@ -2576,7 +2576,12 @@
On 21/05/2024 09:51, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 5/21/2024 3:47 PM, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Hi Henry.
>>
>> On 3/21/2024 11:57 AM, Henry Wang wrote:
In the common sysctl command XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, the value of
cores_per_socket is calculated based on the cpu_core_mask of
Hi Michal,
On 5/21/2024 3:47 PM, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Henry.
On 3/21/2024 11:57 AM, Henry Wang wrote:
In the common sysctl command XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, the value of
cores_per_socket is calculated based on the cpu_core_mask of CPU0.
Currently on Arm this is a fixed value 1 (can be checked
Hi Henry.
On 20/05/2024 04:57, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Gentle ping since it has been a couple of months, any comments on this
> updated patch? Thanks!
Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Kind regards,
> Henry
>
> On 3/21/2024 11:57 AM, Henry Wang wrote:
>> In the common sysctl command
On 20.05.2024 13:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:42:40PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.05.2024 15:38, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:16:11AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
When the flag is set, permit Dom0 to control the device (no worse than
On 20.05.2024 12:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:07:50PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.05.2024 15:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.05.2024 14:42, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at
On 17.05.2024 22:28, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.05.2024 03:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
1) In the discussion George claimed that exposing status information in
an uncontrolled manner is okay.
On 16.05.2024 16:46, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/05/2024 13:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 16.05.2024 14:29, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> On 16/05/2024 12:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:07:10PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Bring test_x86_emulator in
On 20.05.2024 11:32, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> 16.05.24 12:39, Jan Beulich:
>> On 14.05.2024 10:20, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
>>> Moving this function out of mce_intel.c would make it possible to disable
>>> build of Intel MCE code later on, because the function gets called from
>>> common x86 code.
>>
>>
50 matches
Mail list logo
