flight 186158 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186158/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 88a4de450f17c6a319c3e8b2135cd7068a07d0f8
baseline version:
ovmf
flight 186155 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186155/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit1 22 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 186148
build-armhf
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 12:59 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> The compared entities don't really fit together. I think we want a new
> MAX_NR_ALTP2M, which - for the time being - could simply be
>
> #define MAX_NR_ALTP2M MAX_EPTP
>
> in the header. That would then be a suitable replacement for the
>
flight 186152 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186152/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 19 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 186148
build-armhf
flight 186151 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186151/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 186145
Tests which did
flight 186150 linux-6.1 real [real]
flight 186153 linux-6.1 real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186150/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186153/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
