Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86/paravirt: Switch MSR access pv_ops functions to instruction interfaces

On 6/11/2025 5:58 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: I'm just doing a V2 of my series, but this time including the additional support of the non-serializing and immediate forms. Lets see how this will look like. I will drop using the EAX_EDX_* macros, but due to the reason mentioned above I won't switch to

Re: Consider changing CONFIG_ACPI default on ARM?

On 8/23/25 22:06, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 08:59:13AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> >> On 22/08/2025 21:09, Elliott Mitchell wrote: >>> Since you're not pointing to anything definite, could it be everything >>> has been resolved? >> >> Unfortunately, the situation has not c

Re: [PATCH v3 13/15] x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc model checks

On 8/21/25 21:46, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > On 8/22/2025 3:43 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote: >> On 8/21/2025 12:34 PM, Sohil Mehta wrote: >>> On 8/21/2025 6:15 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> Hm. My test host is INTEL_HASWELL_X (0x63f). For reasons which are unclear to me, QEMU doesn't set bit 8 of 0x80

Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] tools: Introduce abi-tool

On 8/21/25 11:25, Teddy Astie wrote: > abi-tool is a small Rust tool that is able to parse ABI yaml > files and generate C stubs for performing hypercalls. > > Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie Would it make sense to generate the hypervisor side of the interface in this way as well? -- Sincerely, Demi

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Introduce eSPI support

Hello Oleksandr, On 24.08.25 20:21, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > > > On 07.08.25 15:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote: >> Hello everyone! > > Hello Leonid, > >> >> ### Background >> Unlike the Linux kernel, which has supported extended shared peripheral >> interrupts (eSPIs) since 2019 [1], Xen c

Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] xen/arm: domain_build: adjust Dom0 IRQ handling to support eSPIs

Hello Oleksandr, Thank you for your question. On 23.08.25 16:02, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > [You don't often get email from olekst...@gmail.com. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > On 07.08.25 15:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote: > > Hello Leoni

Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] xen/arm: vgic: add resource management for extended SPIs

Hello Oleksandr, Thank you for your close review. On 23.08.25 17:39, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > > > On 07.08.25 15:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote: > > > Hello Leonid > >> This change introduces resource management in the VGIC to handle >> extended SPIs introduced in GICv3.1. The pending_ir

Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] xen/arm: gicv3: implement handling of GICv3.1 eSPI

Hi Oleksandr, Thank you for your review comments. On 23.08.25 17:23, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > [You don't often get email from olekst...@gmail.com. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > On 07.08.25 15:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote: > > Hello

Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] xen/arm: vgic: implement helper functions for virq checks

Hello Oleksandr, On 23.08.25 15:29, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > [You don't often get email from olekst...@gmail.com. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > On 07.08.25 15:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote: > > Hello Leonid > > >> Introduced two new

[PATCH v3] docs/misra: fix sphinx-build issues

From: Dmytro Prokopchuk1 Fix the following issues: 1. xen/docs/misra/deviations.rst:90: WARNING: Inline interpreted text or phrase reference start-string without end-string. [docutils] 2. xen/docs/misra/deviations.rst:54: ERROR: Error parsing content block for the "list-table" directive: uniform

[PATCH v2] misra: add deviation for MISRA C Rule 11.3

MISRA C Rule 11.3 states: "A cast shall not be performed between a pointer to object type and a pointer to a different object type." Violations of this rule arise due to the 'container_of()' macro, which casts a member of a structure to its containing structure: container_of(ptr, type, member)

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Introduce eSPI support

On 07.08.25 15:33, Leonid Komarianskyi wrote: Hello everyone! Hello Leonid, ### Background Unlike the Linux kernel, which has supported extended shared peripheral interrupts (eSPIs) since 2019 [1], Xen currently lacks support for this interrupt range. For SoCs with GICv3.1+, this feature

Re: [PATCH] misra: add deviation of Rule 2.1 for BUG() macro

On 2025-08-24 16:56, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote: MISRA C Rule 2.1 states: "A project shall not contain unreachable code". Functions that are non-returning and are not explicitly annotated with the 'noreturn' attribute are considered a violation of this rule. In certain cases, some functions might

[PATCH v4] common/efi: fix Rule 2.1 violation in read_file()

MISRA C Rule 2.1 states: "A project shall not contain unreachable code." The return statements in the 'read_file()' function is unreachable due to function 'PrintErrMesg()' which has 'noreturn' attribute: PrintErrMesg(name, ret); /* not reached */ return false; } No ex

[PATCH] misra: add deviation of Rule 2.1 for BUG() macro

MISRA C Rule 2.1 states: "A project shall not contain unreachable code". Functions that are non-returning and are not explicitly annotated with the 'noreturn' attribute are considered a violation of this rule. In certain cases, some functions might be non-returning in specific build configurations