Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-12 Thread Adam Williamson
do that Fedora doesn't here? > > It might be worth getting in touch with them. They look like a significant > Xen user, on Fedora. I have no idea, but those seem like reasonable questions. I'll see if I can track down a contact point for them. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 17:01 +0300, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 05:56:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > [...] > > So it seems like this would also be a good opportunity to revisit and > > nail down more specifically exactly what our cloud requirements are. >

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2019-08-10 at 00:53 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:57 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Hey folks! I'm starting a new thread for this to trim the recipient > > list a bit and include devel@ and coreos@. > > > > The Story So

[Xen-devel] Xen / EC2 release criteria proposal

2019-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
'd actually use to do anything practical in. 3. I believe this wording is generic enough to cover us if we, e.g., want to start blocking on CoreOS images. All we have to do is declare that some CoreOS image is 'release-blocking', and it's instantly covered by this requirement. -- Adam Williamson

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the > > &g

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the > > > criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, but

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 09:57 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 7/8/19 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-07-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > > > > > providing > > > > > a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers > > > > &g

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
r. We would also have someone who monitors these test results > pro-actively. In theory, yeah, but given the history here I'm somewhat sceptical. I'd also say we still haven't really got a convincing case for why we should continue to block the release (at least in theory) on Fedora working

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-04-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is. > > > > > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and tested regularly > &