On 12/1/23 05:27, George Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:28 PM Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
Hi all,
This vote is in the context of this thread:
https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=169213351810075
To add slightly more context.
The issue here is more than a simple "should we use the word
On 3/13/23 15:14, Jason Andryuk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 2:49 PM Daniel P. Smith
wrote:
On 3/13/23 13:50, Jason Andryuk wrote:
usage(argCnt, argv);
+ if (argCnt == 4) {
+ pirq_label = argv[3];
+ } else {
+ pirq_label = argv[2];
+ }
+
style ni
On 9/28/22 06:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
For quite some time we've been talking about replacing the present virtual
address based hypercall interface with one using physical addresses. This is in
particular a prerequisite to being able to support guests with encrypted
memory, as for such guests we c
On 10/19/20 4:03 PM, Jason Andryuk wrote:
IRQs can be shared, so uniquely labeling doesn't always work. You run
into issues if you have domA_t allowed access to device_A_t and domB_t
to device_B_t. The shared IRQ can only be labeled one of
device_A_t or device_B_t, and assignment of the second
