Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt() prototype
for gcc11"):
> Clearly neither the 1st nor the 2nd argument have a "source size" of 0.
>
> --- a/xen/include/crypto/rijndael.h
> +++ b/xen/include/crypto/rijndael.h
> @@ -52,7 +52,7
On 04.03.2021 13:41, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt()
> prototype for gcc11"):
>> On 04/03/2021 11:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijnda
On 04.03.2021 12:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt()
> prototype for gcc11"):
>> On 03.03.2021 20:09, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> The upcoming r
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt()
prototype for gcc11"):
> On 04/03/2021 11:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt()
> > prototype for gcc11"):
...
> >
On 04/03/2021 11:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt() prototype
for gcc11"):
On 03.03.2021 20:09, Julien Grall wrote:
On 01/03/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
The upcoming release complains, not entirely unreasonably
On 04/03/2021 08:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.03.2021 20:09, Julien Grall wrote:
On 01/03/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
The upcoming release complains, not entirely unreasonably:
In file included from rijndael.c:33:
.../xen/include/crypto/rijndael.h:55:53: note: previously declared as
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH][4.15] crypto: adjust rijndaelEncrypt()
prototype for gcc11"):
> On 03.03.2021 20:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 01/03/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> The upcoming release complains, not entirely unreasonably:
> >>
>
On 03.03.2021 20:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 01/03/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The upcoming release complains, not entirely unreasonably:
>>
>> In file included from rijndael.c:33:
>> .../xen/include/crypto/rijndael.h:55:53: note: previously declared as 'const
>> unsigned char[]'
>> 55
Hi Jan,
On 01/03/2021 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
The upcoming release complains, not entirely unreasonably:
In file included from rijndael.c:33:
.../xen/include/crypto/rijndael.h:55:53: note: previously declared as 'const
unsigned char[]'
55 | voidrijndaelEncrypt(const unsigned int [],
The upcoming release complains, not entirely unreasonably:
In file included from rijndael.c:33:
.../xen/include/crypto/rijndael.h:55:53: note: previously declared as 'const
unsigned char[]'
55 | voidrijndaelEncrypt(const unsigned int [], int, const unsigned char
[],
|
10 matches
Mail list logo
