Re: [PATCH] Fix C compatibility issue in mini-os

On 15.12.23 13:29, Jan Beulich wrote: On 15.12.2023 13:23, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jan Beulich: On 15.12.2023 12:59, Florian Weimer wrote: The cc-option check always fails (that, it picks the second option unconditionally) if the compiler does not support implicit conversion from integers to

Re: [PATCH] Fix C compatibility issue in mini-os

On 15.12.2023 13:23, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jan Beulich: > >> On 15.12.2023 12:59, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> The cc-option check always fails (that, it picks the second option >>> unconditionally) if the compiler does not support implicit conversion >>> from integers to pointers. Just drop the

Re: [PATCH] Fix C compatibility issue in mini-os

* Jan Beulich: > On 15.12.2023 12:59, Florian Weimer wrote: >> The cc-option check always fails (that, it picks the second option >> unconditionally) if the compiler does not support implicit conversion >> from integers to pointers. Just drop the initialization because it >> seems unnecessary in

Re: [PATCH] Fix C compatibility issue in mini-os

On 15.12.2023 12:59, Florian Weimer wrote: > The cc-option check always fails (that, it picks the second option > unconditionally) if the compiler does not support implicit conversion > from integers to pointers. Just drop the initialization because it > seems unnecessary in this context. Did you

[PATCH] Fix C compatibility issue in mini-os

The cc-option check always fails (that, it picks the second option unconditionally) if the compiler does not support implicit conversion from integers to pointers. Just drop the initialization because it seems unnecessary in this context. Related to: