Hi Jan,
> On 9 Sep 2022, at 15:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 09.09.2022 15:50, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 9 Sep 2022, at 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> It has been bothering me for a while that I made a bad suggestion during
>>
>> This is not a sentence for a commit message.
>
> How e
On 09.09.2022 15:50, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 9 Sep 2022, at 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> It has been bothering me for a while that I made a bad suggestion during
>
> This is not a sentence for a commit message.
How else should I express the motivation for the change?
>> review: Having
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 01:50:38PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > On 9 Sep 2022, at 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > --- a/xen/Makefile
> > +++ b/xen/Makefile
> > @@ -746,11 +746,9 @@ cppcheck-version:
> > # documentation file. Also generate a json file with the right arguments for
> > # cppcheck
Hi Jan,
> On 9 Sep 2022, at 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> It has been bothering me for a while that I made a bad suggestion during
This is not a sentence for a commit message.
> review: Having cppcheck-misra.json depend on cppcheck-misra.txt does not
> properly address the multiple targets pro
It has been bothering me for a while that I made a bad suggestion during
review: Having cppcheck-misra.json depend on cppcheck-misra.txt does not
properly address the multiple targets problem. If cppcheck-misra.json
is deleted from the build tree but cppcheck-misra.txt is still there,
nothing will
