Hi George (and sorry for the delay in replying),
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 12:10 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On May 28, 2021, at 4:12 PM, Dario Faggioli
> > wrote:
> > Reported-by: Michał Leszczyński
> > Reported-by: Dion Kant
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
>
> Thanks for tracking this dow
> On May 28, 2021, at 4:12 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>
> A !runnable unit (temporarily) present in the runq may cause us to
> stop scanning the runq itself too early. Of course, we don't run any
> non-runnable vCPUs, but we end the scan and we fallback to picking
> the idle unit. In other word,
A !runnable unit (temporarily) present in the runq may cause us to
stop scanning the runq itself too early. Of course, we don't run any
non-runnable vCPUs, but we end the scan and we fallback to picking
the idle unit. In other word, this prevent us to find there and pick
the actual unit that we're
