Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of asm-offsets.s [and 1 more messages]

2021-02-01 Thread Jan Beulich
On 01.02.2021 16:28, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of > asm-offsets.s [and 1 more messages]"): >> Oh, this used to be different on prior releases once we were >> past the full freeze point. Are to

Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of asm-offsets.s [and 1 more messages]

2021-02-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of asm-offsets.s [and 1 more messages]"): > Oh, this used to be different on prior releases once we were > past the full freeze point. Are to intending to allow bug fixes > without release ack until

Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of asm-offsets.s [and 1 more messages]

2021-02-01 Thread Jan Beulich
On 01.02.2021 16:16, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies > of asm-offsets.s"): >> On 01/02/2021 14:56, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> Going through an intermediate *.new file requires telling the compiler >>> what the real target is, so that the

Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of asm-offsets.s [and 1 more messages]

2021-02-01 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH] x86/build: correctly record dependencies of asm-offsets.s"): > On 01/02/2021 14:56, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Going through an intermediate *.new file requires telling the compiler > > what the real target is, so that the inclusion of the resulting .*.d > > file wil