On 22.02.2023 12:15, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/02/2023 10:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> In COVERAGE=y but DEBUG=n builds (observed by randconfig testing) gcc12
>> takes issue with the subtraction of 1 from __stop___pre_ex_table[],
>> considering this an out of bounds access. Not being able to kno
On 22/02/2023 10:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> In COVERAGE=y but DEBUG=n builds (observed by randconfig testing) gcc12
> takes issue with the subtraction of 1 from __stop___pre_ex_table[],
> considering this an out of bounds access. Not being able to know that
> the symbol actually marks the end of a
In COVERAGE=y but DEBUG=n builds (observed by randconfig testing) gcc12
takes issue with the subtraction of 1 from __stop___pre_ex_table[],
considering this an out of bounds access. Not being able to know that
the symbol actually marks the end of an array, the compiler is kind of
right with this di
