On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.2021 16:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 13.09.2021 15:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I ha
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:10:54PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.2021 16:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 13.09.2021 15:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
> @
On 13.09.2021 16:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.2021 15:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -92,10 +92,16 @@ efi-$(CONFIG_PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE) :=
ifneq
On 13.09.2021 16:33, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.2021 15:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
I haven't been able to find an environment where I could actually try
On 13.09.2021 16:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> .PHONY: clean
>> clean::
>> -rm -f *.lds *.new boot/*.o boot/*~ boot/core boot/mkelf32
>> +rm -f ???.lds *.new .check.* boot/*.o boot/*~ boot/core boot/mkelf32
>
> Forgot to ment
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.2021 15:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> I haven't been able to find an environment where I could actually try
> >> with lld (ld.lld); all testing was with GNU ld
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> .PHONY: clean
> clean::
> - rm -f *.lds *.new boot/*.o boot/*~ boot/core boot/mkelf32
> + rm -f ???.lds *.new .check.* boot/*.o boot/*~ boot/core boot/mkelf32
Forgot to mention in my previous reply, but what's the point of us
On 13.09.2021 15:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I haven't been able to find an environment where I could actually try
>> with lld (ld.lld); all testing was with GNU ld (ld.bfd).
>
> Thanks for fixing this. I've been able to test with LL
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While LLVM's lld is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for GNU ld [1],
> it appears to not understand quoted section names as operands to e.g.
> ADDR(). Therefore the original workaround broke the build in
> environments where ld is a
While LLVM's lld is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for GNU ld [1],
it appears to not understand quoted section names as operands to e.g.
ADDR(). Therefore the original workaround broke the build in
environments where ld is actually LLVM's, like on FreeBSD.
Fixes: 58ad654ebce7 ("x86: work aro
10 matches
Mail list logo