Hi Julien,
I will create a new serie with all the improvements we have discussed.
Thank you for your time.
Cheers,
Luca
> On 18 Mar 2021, at 11:13, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/03/2021 17:04, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Luca,
>
>> I’ve checked the common code and the arm part
On 17/03/2021 17:04, Luca Fancellu wrote:
Hi,
Hi Luca,
I’ve checked the common code and the arm part, I can confirm that the domid 0
is never allocated even if the domain 0 is not present, here the only places
where domain_create(…) is called using a variable value:
Thanks for checking
Hi,
I’ve checked the common code and the arm part, I can confirm that the domid 0
is never allocated even if the domain 0 is not present, here the only places
where domain_create(…) is called using a variable value:
1) xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
d = domain_create(++max_init_domid, &d_cfg, fals
Hi Luca,
On 12/03/2021 09:38, Luca Fancellu wrote:
+
size_t __read_mostly dcache_line_bytes;
/* C entry point for boot CPU */
@@ -804,7 +833,7 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
int cpus, i;
const char *cmdline;
struct bootmodule *xen_bootmodule;
-
Hi all,
> On 8 Mar 2021, at 14:12, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 08/03/2021 11:56, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
>> building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
>> kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
>
> As
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
> building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
> kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 83 +
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.03.2021 15:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 08/03/2021 11:56, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> >> This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
> >> building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
> >> kernel is not found and at least one domU is
On 08.03.2021 15:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 08/03/2021 11:56, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
>> building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
>> kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
>
> As you are skipping dom0, the domid
Hi Luca,
On 08/03/2021 11:56, Luca Fancellu wrote:
This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
As you are skipping dom0, the domid 0 will not be usable for another
domain.
> On 8 Mar 2021, at 11:59, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> On 08/03/2021 11:56, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
>> building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
>> kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
>> Signed-off
Hi Luca,
On 08/03/2021 11:56, Luca Fancellu wrote:
This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu
I have received 3 versions of this patch, can yo
This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu
---
xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 83 +++-
1 file changed, 59 inserti
This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu
Change-Id: Ieb9630b80cc7be7688d7d5fff3f839958f142ac0
---
xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 83 +++
This patch prevents the dom0 to be loaded skipping its
building and going forward to build domUs when the dom0
kernel is not found and at least one domU is present.
Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu
Change-Id: Ieb9630b80cc7be7688d7d5fff3f839958f142ac0
---
xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 83 +++
14 matches
Mail list logo
