ksandr_tyshche...@epam.com
> > ; ax...@kernel.dk
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkfront: Only check REQ_FUA for writes
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> > > The existing code silently converts read operations with the
> > >
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 4:57 PM
> To: Ross Lagerwall
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org ;
> jgr...@suse.com ; sstabell...@kernel.org
> ; oleksandr_tyshche...@epam.com
> ; ax...@kernel.dk
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkfront: Only
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> The existing code silently converts read operations with the
> REQ_FUA bit set into write-barrier operations. This results in data
> loss as the backend scribbles zeroes over the data instead of returning
> it.
>
> While the
On 26.04.23 18:40, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
The existing code silently converts read operations with the
REQ_FUA bit set into write-barrier operations. This results in data
loss as the backend scribbles zeroes over the data instead of returning
it.
While the REQ_FUA bit doesn't make sense on a
The existing code silently converts read operations with the
REQ_FUA bit set into write-barrier operations. This results in data
loss as the backend scribbles zeroes over the data instead of returning
it.
While the REQ_FUA bit doesn't make sense on a read operation, at least
one well-known
