On 14.10.2024 13:01, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 14.10.24 12:48, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 14/10/2024 11:33, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> domctl.h and sysctl.h have an interface version, which needs to be
>>> bumped in case of incompatible modifications of the interface.
>>
>> What about vm_event.h?
>
> I
On 14.10.24 12:48, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 14/10/2024 11:33, Juergen Gross wrote:
domctl.h and sysctl.h have an interface version, which needs to be
bumped in case of incompatible modifications of the interface.
What about vm_event.h?
Indeed.
There seem to be others missing, too
Hi Juergen,
On 14/10/2024 11:33, Juergen Gross wrote:
domctl.h and sysctl.h have an interface version, which needs to be
bumped in case of incompatible modifications of the interface.
What about vm_event.h?
In order to avoid misunderstandings, add a comment to both headers
specifying in whi
On 14.10.2024 12:33, Juergen Gross wrote:
> domctl.h and sysctl.h have an interface version, which needs to be
> bumped in case of incompatible modifications of the interface.
>
> In order to avoid misunderstandings, add a comment to both headers
> specifying in which cases a bump is needed.
>
>
domctl.h and sysctl.h have an interface version, which needs to be
bumped in case of incompatible modifications of the interface.
In order to avoid misunderstandings, add a comment to both headers
specifying in which cases a bump is needed.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
xen/include/public/do
