On 13/05/2025 12:04 am, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 5/12/25 2:25 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.05.2025 14:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Now for the (new) controversial part. Since sending this, Linux has
decided to jus
On 5/12/25 2:25 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.05.2025 14:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> Now for the (new) controversial part. Since sending this, Linux has
>>> decided to just #define auto __auto_type for C < 23, in order to s
On 2025-05-12 20:25, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.05.2025 14:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> Now for the (new) controversial part. Since sending this, Linux has
> decided to just #define auto __auto_type for C < 23, in order to start
>
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.05.2025 14:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >
> > Now for the (new) controversial part. Since sending this, Linux has
> > decided to just #define auto __auto_type for C < 23, in order to start
> > writing C23 compatible code from now.
On 12.05.2025 14:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/05/2025 12:59 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.05.2025 21:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote:
In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param) in
order
to ensure that side ef
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:09 PM Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2025 12:59 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 05.05.2025 21:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param) in
> >>> order
> >>> to
On 12/05/2025 12:59 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.05.2025 21:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param) in
>>> order
>>> to ensure that side effects are only evaluated once. A consequence of
On 05.05.2025 21:44, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param) in
>> order
>> to ensure that side effects are only evaluated once. A consequence of this
>> is
>> double textural expansion of the p
On Mon, 5 May 2025, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param) in order
> to ensure that side effects are only evaluated once. A consequence of this is
> double textural expansion of the parameter, which can get out of hand very
> quickly with nest
On 05/05/2025 1:57 pm, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2025-05-05 14:46, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param)
>> in order
>> to ensure that side effects are only evaluated once. A consequence
>> of this is
>> double textural expansion of the para
On 2025-05-05 14:46, Andrew Cooper wrote:
In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param)
in order
to ensure that side effects are only evaluated once. A consequence of
this is
double textural expansion of the parameter, which can get out of hand
very
quickly with nested
In macros it is common to declare local variables using typeof(param) in order
to ensure that side effects are only evaluated once. A consequence of this is
double textural expansion of the parameter, which can get out of hand very
quickly with nested macros.
A GCC extension, __auto_type, is now
12 matches
Mail list logo
