Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: use default TX queue size for vifs

2023-10-08 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by David S. Miller : On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:08:31 +0200 you wrote: > Do not set netback interfaces (vifs) default TX queue size to the ring size. > The TX queue size is not related to the ring size, and using the ring size > (32) > as the qu

Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: use default TX queue size for vifs

2023-10-06 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 04:08:31PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Do not set netback interfaces (vifs) default TX queue size to the ring size. > The TX queue size is not related to the ring size, and using the ring size > (32) > as the queue size can lead to packet drops. Note the TX side of the

Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: use default TX queue size for vifs

2023-10-06 Thread Ross Lagerwall
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 3:08 PM Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > Do not set netback interfaces (vifs) default TX queue size to the ring size. > The TX queue size is not related to the ring size, and using the ring size > (32) > as the queue size can lead to packet drops. Note the TX side of the vif > i

[PATCH] xen-netback: use default TX queue size for vifs

2023-10-05 Thread Roger Pau Monne
Do not set netback interfaces (vifs) default TX queue size to the ring size. The TX queue size is not related to the ring size, and using the ring size (32) as the queue size can lead to packet drops. Note the TX side of the vif interface in the netback domain is the one receiving packets to be in