Re: [PATCH 0/3] Stack checking on Arm

On 29/07/2024 10:37 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 29/07/2024 15:24, Stewart Hildebrand wrote: >>> This series introduces stack check instrumentation on Arm. This is >>> helpful for safety certification efforts. I'm sending this in an RFC >>

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Stack checking on Arm

On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 29/07/2024 15:24, Stewart Hildebrand wrote: > > This series introduces stack check instrumentation on Arm. This is > > helpful for safety certification efforts. I'm sending this in an RFC > > state because I wanted to gather opinions on the app

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Stack checking on Arm

On 29/07/2024 19:39, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 29/07/2024 15:24, Stewart Hildebrand wrote: This series introduces stack check instrumentation on Arm. This is helpful for safety certification efforts. I'm sending this in an RFC state because I wanted to gather opinions on the approach of usi

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Stack checking on Arm

Hi, On 29/07/2024 15:24, Stewart Hildebrand wrote: This series introduces stack check instrumentation on Arm. This is helpful for safety certification efforts. I'm sending this in an RFC state because I wanted to gather opinions on the approach of using -finstrument-functions. This looks ok fo

[PATCH 0/3] Stack checking on Arm

This series introduces stack check instrumentation on Arm. This is helpful for safety certification efforts. I'm sending this in an RFC state because I wanted to gather opinions on the approach of using -finstrument-functions. Stewart Hildebrand (3): xen: add no_instrument_function attributes