On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:06:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.06.2023 13:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 01.06.2023 11:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> To
On 01.06.2023 13:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.06.2023 11:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
To avoid the need for a forward declaration of pit_load_count() in a
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.06.2023 11:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> To avoid the need for a forward declaration of pit_load_count() in a
> >> subsequent change, move it earlier in the file
On 01.06.2023 11:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> To avoid the need for a forward declaration of pit_load_count() in a
>> subsequent change, move it earlier in the file (along with its helper
>> callback).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> To avoid the need for a forward declaration of pit_load_count() in a
> subsequent change, move it earlier in the file (along with its helper
> callback).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné
Just a couple of
To avoid the need for a forward declaration of pit_load_count() in a
subsequent change, move it earlier in the file (along with its helper
callback).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/emul-i8254.c
@@ -87,6 +87,57 @@ static int pit_get_count(PITState
