On 10.09.2021 16:50, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools/libacpi: Use 64-byte alignment
> for FACS"):
>> The current code is clearly wrong, but happens to work correctly in
>> hvmloader because FACS is the first table written and it starts
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools/libacpi: Use 64-byte alignment for
FACS"):
> The current code is clearly wrong, but happens to work correctly in
> hvmloader because FACS is the first table written and it starts on a
> page boundary. The logic does not work c
On 09.09.2021 18:34, Kevin Stefanov wrote:
> The spec requires 64-byte alignment, not 16.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Stefanov
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
On 09/09/2021 17:34, Kevin Stefanov wrote:
> The spec requires 64-byte alignment, not 16.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Stefanov
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich
> CC: Andrew Cooper
>
> Note: This does not fix the FACS alignment inside guests yet. See next
> patch.
The history here is complex.
c/s 938cee9d4
The spec requires 64-byte alignment, not 16.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Stefanov
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Andrew Cooper
Note: This does not fix the FACS alignment inside guests yet. See next
patch.
---
tools/libacpi/build.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/li
