Hi Michal,
> -Original Message-
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] xen/arm: vpl011: Fix misleading comments
>
> In both vpl011_read_data() and vpl011_read_data_xen(), there is a comment
> stating that the guest is expected to read the DR register only if the
> TXFE bit of FR r
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> On 05/04/2023 12:17, Michal Orzel wrote:
> > In both vpl011_read_data() and vpl011_read_data_xen(), there is a comment
> > stating that the guest is expected to read the DR register only if the
> > TXFE bit of FR register is not set. This is obviously
On 05/04/2023 12:17, Michal Orzel wrote:
In both vpl011_read_data() and vpl011_read_data_xen(), there is a comment
stating that the guest is expected to read the DR register only if the
TXFE bit of FR register is not set. This is obviously logically wrong and
it should be RXFE (i.e. RX FIFO emp
In both vpl011_read_data() and vpl011_read_data_xen(), there is a comment
stating that the guest is expected to read the DR register only if the
TXFE bit of FR register is not set. This is obviously logically wrong and
it should be RXFE (i.e. RX FIFO empty bit set -> nothing to read).
Signed-off-b
