Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/shim: don't permit HVM and PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE at the same time

2020-09-15 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > This combination doesn't really make sense (and there likely are more). > The alternative here would be some presumably intrusive #ifdef-ary to > get this combination to actually build again. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich I'm not su

Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/shim: don't permit HVM and PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE at the same time

2020-09-15 Thread Jan Beulich
On 15.09.2020 13:02, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> This combination doesn't really make sense (and there likely are more). >> The alternative here would be some presumably intrusive #ifdef-ary to >> get this combination to actually build ag

[PATCH 3/3] x86/shim: don't permit HVM and PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE at the same time

2020-09-14 Thread Jan Beulich
This combination doesn't really make sense (and there likely are more). The alternative here would be some presumably intrusive #ifdef-ary to get this combination to actually build again. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ config X8