On 12.11.2024 11:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/11/2024 10:49 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.11.2024 11:36, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2024 9:58 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/11/2024 12:21 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> With the tangle of logic starting to come under control, it is
On 12/11/2024 10:49 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.11.2024 11:36, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/11/2024 9:58 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2024 12:21 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
With the tangle of logic starting to come under control, it is now plain to
see that parse_blob()'s side e
On 12.11.2024 11:36, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/11/2024 9:58 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/11/2024 12:21 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> With the tangle of logic starting to come under control, it is now plain to
>>> see that parse_blob()'s side effect of re-gathering the signature/revision
>>>
On 07/11/2024 9:58 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/11/2024 12:21 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> With the tangle of logic starting to come under control, it is now plain to
>> see that parse_blob()'s side effect of re-gathering the signature/revision is
>> pointless.
>>
>> The cpu_request_microcode()
On 07/11/2024 12:21 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> With the tangle of logic starting to come under control, it is now plain to
> see that parse_blob()'s side effect of re-gathering the signature/revision is
> pointless.
>
> The cpu_request_microcode() hooks need the signature only. The BSP gathers
> t
With the tangle of logic starting to come under control, it is now plain to
see that parse_blob()'s side effect of re-gathering the signature/revision is
pointless.
The cpu_request_microcode() hooks need the signature only. The BSP gathers
this in early_microcode_init(), the APs and S3 in microco
