On 10.09.2020 22:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/09/2020 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.09.2020 11:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Split into two functions. Passing a load of zeros in results in somewhat
>>> poor
>>> register scheduling in __context_switch().
>> I'm afraid I don't understand
On 10/09/2020 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.2020 11:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Split into two functions. Passing a load of zeros in results in somewhat
>> poor
>> register scheduling in __context_switch().
> I'm afraid I don't understand why this would be, no matter that
> I trust you
On 09.09.2020 11:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Split into two functions. Passing a load of zeros in results in somewhat poor
> register scheduling in __context_switch().
I'm afraid I don't understand why this would be, no matter that
I trust you having observed this being the case: The registers
Split into two functions. Passing a load of zeros in results in somewhat poor
register scheduling in __context_switch().
Update the prefetching comment to note that the main point is the TLB fill.
Reorder the writes in svm_load_segs() to access the VMCB fields in ascending
order, which gets
