On 02/05/2024 07:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.05.2024 08:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.05.2024 18:35, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 26/03/2024 16:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.01.2024 16:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> --- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
> +++ b/xen/lib/x86/poli
On 02.05.2024 08:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.05.2024 18:35, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 26/03/2024 16:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 09.01.2024 16:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
--- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
+++ b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
@@ -2,15 +2,78 @@
#include
On 01.05.2024 18:35, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/03/2024 16:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.01.2024 16:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
>>> +++ b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
>>> @@ -2,15 +2,78 @@
>>>
>>> #include
>>>
>>> -uint32_t x86_x2apic_id_from_vcpu_id(c
Hi,
On 26/03/2024 16:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.01.2024 16:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> --- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
>> +++ b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
>> @@ -2,15 +2,78 @@
>>
>> #include
>>
>> -uint32_t x86_x2apic_id_from_vcpu_id(const struct cpu_policy *p, uint32_t
>> vcpu_id)
>> +static
Hi,
Ack and sure to everything on types, constness and variable names.
On 20/03/2024 10:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> +const char *name;
>> +uint32_t vcpu_id;
>> +uint32_t x2apic_id;
>> +struct cpu_policy policy;
>> +} tests[] = {
>> +{
>> +
On 09.01.2024 16:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> --- a/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
> +++ b/xen/lib/x86/policy.c
> @@ -2,15 +2,78 @@
>
> #include
>
> -uint32_t x86_x2apic_id_from_vcpu_id(const struct cpu_policy *p, uint32_t
> vcpu_id)
> +static uint32_t parts_per_higher_scoped_level(const struct cpu_
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 03:38:33PM +, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Implements the helper for mapping vcpu_id to x2apic_id given a valid
> topology in a policy. The algo is written with the intention of extending
> it to leaves 0x1f and e26 in the future.
>
> Toolstack doesn't set leaf 0xb and th
Implements the helper for mapping vcpu_id to x2apic_id given a valid
topology in a policy. The algo is written with the intention of extending
it to leaves 0x1f and e26 in the future.
Toolstack doesn't set leaf 0xb and the HVM default policy has it cleared,
so the leaf is not implemented. In that
