Re: [PATCH 6/9] x86emul: support AVX-IFMA insns

2023-04-06 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 04/04/2023 3:53 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > As in a few cases before (in particular: AVX512_IFMA), since the insns > here and in particular their memory access patterns follow the usual > scheme, I didn't think it was necessary to add a contrived test > specifically for them. > > Signed-off-by: Jan

[PATCH 6/9] x86emul: support AVX-IFMA insns

2023-04-04 Thread Jan Beulich
As in a few cases before (in particular: AVX512_IFMA), since the insns here and in particular their memory access patterns follow the usual scheme, I didn't think it was necessary to add a contrived test specifically for them. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_cpuid.c +++ b