Re: [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: Make all security support explicit

2023-05-03 Thread George Dunlap
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 12:19 PM Jan Beulich wrote: > On 28.04.2023 10:12, George Dunlap wrote: > > --- a/SUPPORT.md > > +++ b/SUPPORT.md > > @@ -17,6 +17,36 @@ for the definitions of the support status levels etc. > > Release Notes > > : https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_X.YY_Release

Re: [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: Make all security support explicit

2023-05-02 Thread Jan Beulich
On 28.04.2023 10:14, George Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:12 AM George Dunlap wrote: > It occurred to me that in many (most? all?) cases it would be more > effective to define the security support parameters in the > documentation itself. I think I agree; the alternative of needing to

Re: [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: Make all security support explicit

2023-05-02 Thread Jan Beulich
On 28.04.2023 10:12, George Dunlap wrote: > --- a/SUPPORT.md > +++ b/SUPPORT.md > @@ -17,6 +17,36 @@ for the definitions of the support status levels etc. > Release Notes > : href="https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_X.YY_Release_Notes";>RN > > +# General security support > + > +An XS

Re: [PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: Make all security support explicit

2023-04-28 Thread George Dunlap
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:12 AM George Dunlap wrote: > The initial goal of SUPPORT.md was to help both users, and the Xen > Project Security Team, determine what functionality was security > supported; i.e., what kinds of security bugs would trigger an XSA. > > Our proposal is that as of 4.18, al

[PATCH RFC] SUPPORT.md: Make all security support explicit

2023-04-28 Thread George Dunlap
The initial goal of SUPPORT.md was to help both users, and the Xen Project Security Team, determine what functionality was security supported; i.e., what kinds of security bugs would trigger an XSA. Our proposal is that as of 4.18, all functionality not explicitly listed as security supported will