Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function parameters in compat mode

2021-11-22 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.11.2021 18:09, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function > parameters in compat mode"): >> Some hardtabs appear to have slipped in. > > Thanks. Fixed. > >> Jan gave a conditional R-by which

Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function parameters in compat mode

2021-11-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function parameters in compat mode"): > Some hardtabs appear to have slipped in. Thanks. Fixed. > Jan gave a conditional R-by which permitted a change along these lines, > but he's left the office no

Re: [PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function parameters in compat mode

2021-11-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 19/11/2021 15:24, Ian Jackson wrote: > diff --git a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c > index 375b94229e..089bb0eb1b 100644 > --- a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c > +++ b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c > @@ -638,16 +641,36 @@ int efi_runtime_call(struct xenpf_efi_runtime_call *op) > >

[PATCH for-4.16 v3] efi: fix alignment of function parameters in compat mode

2021-11-19 Thread Ian Jackson
From: Roger Pau Monne Currently the max_store_size, remain_store_size and max_size in compat_pf_efi_runtime_call are 4 byte aligned, which makes clang 13.0.0 complain with: In file included from compat.c:30: ./runtime.c:646:13: error: passing 4-byte aligned argument to 8-byte aligned parameter