On 15/11/2022 16:12, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:39AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> I was really hoping to avoid this, but its now too late in the 4.17 freeze
>> and
>> we still don't have working fixes.
> The fix I proposed still has some comments that have been unansw
On 16.11.2022 19:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 15/11/2022 08:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.11.2022 01:35, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> I was really hoping to avoid this, but its now too late in the 4.17 freeze
>>> and
>>> we still don't have working fixes.
>>>
>>> The in-Xen calculations for assista
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper
> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.17] x86/hvm: Revert per-domain APIC acceleration
> support
>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> > Provisional upon Roger not objecting (i.e. him at least remaining
> &g
On 15/11/2022 08:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.11.2022 01:35, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> I was really hoping to avoid this, but its now too late in the 4.17 freeze
>> and
>> we still don't have working fixes.
>>
>> The in-Xen calculations for assistance capabilities are buggy. For the
>> avoidance
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:35:39AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I was really hoping to avoid this, but its now too late in the 4.17 freeze and
> we still don't have working fixes.
The fix I proposed still has some comments that have been unanswered,
but at any rate thit is now far too late to try
On 15.11.2022 01:35, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> I was really hoping to avoid this, but its now too late in the 4.17 freeze and
> we still don't have working fixes.
>
> The in-Xen calculations for assistance capabilities are buggy. For the
> avoidance of doubt, the original intention was to be able to
I was really hoping to avoid this, but its now too late in the 4.17 freeze and
we still don't have working fixes.
The in-Xen calculations for assistance capabilities are buggy. For the
avoidance of doubt, the original intention was to be able to control every
aspect of a APIC acceleration so we c
