On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:11:40AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.12.2022 00:27, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
> > in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this turns out to be
> > a bad idea. Ard Biesheuvel point
On 07.12.2022 00:27, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
> in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this turns out to be
> a bad idea. Ard Biesheuvel pointed out that EfiRuntimeServices* memory
> winds up fragmenting both th
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 02:44:11AM +, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi Demi,
>
> (+Julien for his info since I am replying below about the 4.17 stuff)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Demi Marie Obenour
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] Use EfiACPIReclaimMemory for
Hi Demi,
(+Julien for his info since I am replying below about the 4.17 stuff)
> -Original Message-
> From: Demi Marie Obenour
> Subject: [PATCH v2] Use EfiACPIReclaimMemory for ESRT
>
> A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
>
A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this turns out to be
a bad idea. Ard Biesheuvel pointed out that EfiRuntimeServices* memory
winds up fragmenting both the EFI page tables and the direct map, and
that EfiACPIR
On 11.10.2022 18:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:59:01AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.10.2022 05:42, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>> A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
>>> in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this tur
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:59:01AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2022 05:42, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
> > in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this turns out to be
> > a bad idea. Ard Biesheuvel point
On 11.10.2022 05:42, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
> in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this turns out to be
> a bad idea. Ard Biesheuvel pointed out that EfiRuntimeServices* memory
> winds up fragmenting both th
A previous patch tried to get Linux to use the ESRT under Xen if it is
in memory of type EfiRuntimeServicesData. However, this turns out to be
a bad idea. Ard Biesheuvel pointed out that EfiRuntimeServices* memory
winds up fragmenting both the EFI page tables and the direct map, and
that EfiACPIR
