On 18/11/2020 07:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Michal,
On 17.11.2020 18:30, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Michal,
On 16/11/2020 12:11, Michal Orzel wrote:
On the affected Cortex-A76/Neoverse-N1 cores (r0p0 to r3p0),
if a virtual address for a cacheable mapping of a location is being
ac
Hi Julien,
On 17.11.2020 18:30, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 16/11/2020 12:11, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> On the affected Cortex-A76/Neoverse-N1 cores (r0p0 to r3p0),
>> if a virtual address for a cacheable mapping of a location is being
>> accessed by a core while another core is remappin
Hi Michal,
On 16/11/2020 12:11, Michal Orzel wrote:
On the affected Cortex-A76/Neoverse-N1 cores (r0p0 to r3p0),
if a virtual address for a cacheable mapping of a location is being
accessed by a core while another core is remapping the virtual
address to a new physical page using the recommended
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020, Michal Orzel wrote:
> On the affected Cortex-A76/Neoverse-N1 cores (r0p0 to r3p0),
> if a virtual address for a cacheable mapping of a location is being
> accessed by a core while another core is remapping the virtual
> address to a new physical page using the recommended break
Hi,
> On 16 Nov 2020, at 12:11, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
> On the affected Cortex-A76/Neoverse-N1 cores (r0p0 to r3p0),
> if a virtual address for a cacheable mapping of a location is being
> accessed by a core while another core is remapping the virtual
> address to a new physical page using the r
On the affected Cortex-A76/Neoverse-N1 cores (r0p0 to r3p0),
if a virtual address for a cacheable mapping of a location is being
accessed by a core while another core is remapping the virtual
address to a new physical page using the recommended break-before-make
sequence, then under very rare circu